Security audit
Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk
This local self-assessment tool behaves as described, although its permission declarations need correction.
Use --system for text input, or supply only an answer file you intend the tool to read. Restrict access to that file and avoid granting unused write or network tools. The permission declarations are inconsistent and should not be treated as sandbox guarantees. Scores reflect a self-reported rubric, not independent certification. Inspection resolved the scanner's material coverage gaps.
The manifest declares filesystem access disabled while advertising a local-file --answers input and allowing Read, Write, Bash, and WebFetch tools. This inconsistent permission contract could lead users or agent hosts to authorize behavior under an inaccurate no-filesystem assumption; the documented audit purpose explains the read but does not resolve the permission violation.
The --answers branch directly opens a caller-supplied local path without checking an approved input boundary, despite the declared filesystem prohibition. If execution has ambient filesystem privileges, this permits reads outside the advertised permission contract; the code does not demonstrate network exfiltration or a bypass of an enforced sandbox.
