Install
openclaw skills install @william202404/poc-to-contract-closerClosing playbook for converting a successful ToB POC into a contract. Use when a POC is technically accepted, near final demo, has cleared P0 issues, or has stalled after success and the team needs a structured contract path, gap list, one-page recap, quote action, and launch-node plan.
openclaw skills install @william202404/poc-to-contract-closerUse this skill after tob-poc-war-room says the POC is closeable or in closing range.
The goal is to prevent a successful POC from losing momentum. POC success is not a contract. The work is to convert evidence into a buying process.
Use the POC summary from tob-poc-war-room when available:
If the input is incomplete, output a closing gap list instead of pretending the path is ready.
Closing has a window. POC success decays fast.
| Time since POC accepted | Risk level | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 0-7 days | Low | Proceed through six steps |
| 7-14 days | Medium | Escalate: Champion must confirm buying path within 48h |
| >14 days no progress | High — Cooldown Risk | Pull Champion for face-to-face. If no response, return to tob-poc-war-room for re-assessment |
| >30 days stalled | Critical | Treat as lost. Archive and note lessons. |
Also check external deadlines:
If a hard deadline is approaching, compress the six-step cycle: do Steps 1-3 in one pass, not sequentially.
The POC result must be expressible in one sentence:
If the result is vague, first action is to produce a POC recap, not a quote.
Never let a small open issue become an excuse for silent delay. Decide: close, workaround, or backlog.
Champion approval is not enough.
Check:
If decision maker is missing, next action is an executive recap meeting, not another technical demo.
Produce a one-page recap before pricing pressure starts.
Two-part structure:
Part A must be forwardable in a chat or email without attachments. Part B supports internal evaluation.
Before quoting, determine the buying path:
If procurement path is unknown, next action is NOT a quote. Next action is to confirm procurement path with Champion or economic buyer.
Risk: In ToB, most deals with compliance requirements default to bidding. Assuming single source without checking is a common failure mode.
Quote only after the value and buyer path are clear.
Quote action must include:
If budget is unknown, ask for buying-process confirmation before sending a detailed quote.
Every closing plan needs a launch node:
Without launch node, the contract has no urgency.
If closing stalls despite following the method:
tob-poc-war-room for re-assessmenttob-competitor-sniptob-poc-war-room for stakeholder rebuildDo not keep cycling through the six steps if the underlying buying process has changed.
## POC-to-Contract Closing Plan
### 1. Closing Readiness
- Status: Ready / Nearly ready / Not ready / Blocked / Stalled
- Reason:
- Main blocker:
- Time risk: <14 days since POC accepted / 14-30 days / >30 days
- Procurement path: confirmed / unknown / bidding required
### 2. Six-Step Checklist
| Step | Status | Evidence | Gap | Owner | Next action |
### 3. One-Page Recap Draft
**Part A — Decision Maker Summary (3 sentences):**
- Pain → Result → Request
**Part B — Internal Evaluation Detail:**
- Original pain:
- POC scope:
- Result:
- Business value:
- Remaining risks:
- Rollout proposal:
- Decision requested:
### 4. Customer Message
- Recipient:
- Objective:
- Draft:
### 5. Quote / Commercial Action
- Quote now? yes/no
- Scope:
- Assumptions:
- Owner:
- Deadline:
### 6. Launch Node
- Proposed kickoff:
- First milestone:
- Customer dependency:
- Success metric:
### 7. Risks
- Buying-process risk:
- Technical residual risk:
- Silence / momentum risk:
- Time risk: cooling window status
- Procurement path risk: single source vs bidding uncertainty
Input:
POC pass rate 93%. Four of five issues closed within 48h. Last issue has workaround. Champion says result is good. No decision maker meeting yet. Customer has been quiet for 7 days after recap.
Expected reasoning: