Back to skill

Security audit

员工手册章节台

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

This is a simple HR handbook drafting skill with clear limits and no evidence of hidden execution, data access, persistence, or exfiltration.

Before installing, treat this as a drafting assistant for HR handbook language, not legal advice. Provide only the company context needed for the draft, avoid unnecessary personal employee details, and have final policies reviewed by a qualified HR or labor-law professional.

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
  • Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
  • Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
  • Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
  • Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs
Vulnerability Patterns
  • Trigger AbuseOverly Broad Trigger, Shadow Command Trigger, Keyword Baiting Trigger
  • Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
  • Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
  • Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
  • Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code
Findings (2)

Vague Triggers

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
91% confidence
Finding

The trigger keywords are broad HR phrases such as '员工手册', '考勤制度', and '离职流程' that can appear in ordinary conversation without a clear request to invoke this skill. This can cause over-activation, routing unrelated HR/legal discussions into a skill that generates policy text, increasing the chance of inappropriate or low-context output being treated as authoritative.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Vague Triggers

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
89% confidence
Finding

The natural-language examples are open-ended and do not define clear boundaries for when the skill should activate versus when the system should ask clarifying questions or avoid activation. In a compliance-adjacent HR context, this broad matching can misroute general labor-law or employee-relations questions into a document-drafting workflow, creating risk that users rely on generated policy language without sufficient context.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Static analysis

No suspicious patterns detected.