find-app-ideas

Finds underserved App Store / Google Play niches with live AppGoat data - search demand (keyword popularity) against weak supply (low ratings, abandoned incumbents, few strong apps) - and returns a ranked shortlist of app ideas with evidence and user pain points.

Turns "what should I build?" into a ranked shortlist of niches where people search a lot and the existing apps are weak. Each pick comes with the numbers behind it and what users of the current apps complain about, so the idea has a wedge.

Everything is built from the public read tools (charts, keyword research, apps, search, reviews), so it runs on every plan.

When to use

• The user has no idea yet, or a broad area ("health", "something for teachers").
• The user has an idea and wants to know if there is demand and room ("validate a habit tracker for ADHD").
• Not for improving an existing app (use app-audit-lite or aso-keywords-metadata-rewrite).

Inputs

• niche (optional): a seed area or idea, e.g. habit tracker, plant care, finance for couples. Without it, start from the charts (step 1).
• store (optional, default apple): apple or play. Run once per store; demand differs.
• country (optional, default us).

Ask at most one question before starting: whether the user has constraints (solo dev, no backend, paid vs free). Otherwise assume a solo developer shipping in 4–8 weeks.

Steps

Costs in AppGoat credits; watch the footer of each tool result. Without the MCP, use the REST equivalents in reference/api.md.

1. Seeds.
   • With niche: write 8–10 seed terms a user would type into the store (2–3 words, no brand names).
   • Without niche: get_charts {store, country, chart: "free", category} and {chart: "grossing"} for 4 categories (Apple genre ids: 6013 Health & Fitness, 6007 Productivity, 6017 Education, 6012 Lifestyle; Play: HEALTH_AND_FITNESS, PRODUCTIVITY, EDUCATION, LIFESTYLE) - 8 calls, 8 credits. Take apps with is_new or delta ≥ 10 and the grossing apps outside the top 20 free; derive 8–10 seed terms from what they do.
2. Expand. keyword_research {terms: 5 seeds, store, country, include: ["related", "suggestions"]}, twice for 10 seeds - 5 per seed, 50 credits. Collect related terms and suggestions.
3. Measure candidates. Pick the 25 most specific candidate terms (prefer 2–4 words that describe a job, e.g. "adhd planner", not "planner"). keyword_research {terms: 25 terms, store, country, include: ["top_apps"]} - 1 per keyword, 25 credits. Terms that come back pending are being measured: call again with just those after a minute (charged again only for those).
4. Check supply. For the 8 best terms by the demand rule below: get_app {app: <app_id>, store, country} for the top 3 top_apps of each - ~24 credits - to read updated_at, rating, ratings_count, price, has_iap. Optionally search_apps {q: term, store, limit: 20} - 1 each - to count how many apps target it directly by title.
5. Find the wedge. For the 5 best niches: get_reviews {app: , store, country, rating: "1-2", limit: 100} for the top 2 incumbents - ~10 credits. Group complaints into themes.
6. Rank and write up (no calls).

Budget: about 150–200 credits per run (up to ~250 with refreshes and re-measured pending terms). Stop early if credits_remaining falls below the remaining budget and tell the user.

Decision rules

• Demand: popularity ≥ 30 (5–100 scale). Popularity ≥ 50 with difficulty ≥ 70 is a "big but crowded" market: keep it only if supply is weak.
• Difficulty: ≤ 55 to be a candidate; ≤ 35 is "easy".
• Weak supply (at least one must hold):
  • median rating of the top 10 < 4.3, or
  • ≥ 3 of the top 10 not updated in 12 months, or
  • ≤ 2 of the top 10 have the term (or a close variant) in their title, or
  • the top 3 average < 5,000 ratings (Apple) / < 100k installs (Play).
• Monetization signal: at least one top-10 app has IAP or is paid, or the term's apps appear in the grossing chart. Without it, label the idea "hobby / growth only".
• Idea score (rank by it): popularity × (1 − difficulty/100) × supply_weakness, where supply_weakness = 1 + 0.25 per weak-supply condition met (max 2).
• Wedge: a pick needs a complaint theme mentioned in ≥ 5 of the incumbents' 1–2★ reviews, or a missing feature named in ≥ 3. No wedge: drop it to the "watch" list.
• Exclude: regulated or high-liability niches (medical diagnosis, lending, gambling), anything that depends on another company's private API, and terms that are mostly a brand name.
• Return 3–5 picks. If fewer qualify, say so and show the near misses with the rule they failed.

Output format

markdown

# App ideas: <niche or "chart scan"> (<store>, <country>) - <date>

| # | Idea | Key term | Popularity | Difficulty | Top-10 median ★ | Stale incumbents | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ADHD-friendly habit tracker | adhd habit tracker | 41 | 28 | 4.1 | 4 of 10 | 39.4 |

## 1. <Idea>
- **Demand:** <term> (pop 41), <term 2> (pop 33), related: <terms>
- **Supply:** top apps <name (4.0★, updated 2024-11)>, …; only 1 of 10 has the term in its title.
- **Wedge:** users complain about <theme> ("<≤ 120-char quote>", 2★) and <theme>.
- **Money:** <who charges what>.
- **MVP in one line:** <scope a solo dev can ship in 4-8 weeks>.
- **Launch keywords:** title "<≤ 30 chars>", subtitle "<≤ 30 chars>".

## Near misses
- <term>: popularity 58 but difficulty 81 and top apps average 4.7★.

_Credits used: <sum of the footers>._

**Automate this →** re-run monthly to see new movers; once you pick one, track its keywords with
`track_keywords` and run `aso-keywords-metadata-rewrite` before launch.

Automate it

A monthly scan that opens an issue with new picks.

GitHub Action (.github/workflows/appgoat-ideas.yml, secrets ANTHROPIC_API_KEY, APPGOAT_API_KEY):

yaml

name: AppGoat app ideas
on:
  schedule:
    - cron: "0 8 1 * *"
  workflow_dispatch:
    inputs:
      niche:
        description: Seed niche (optional)
        required: false
permissions:
  contents: read
  issues: write
jobs:
  ideas:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
      - name: Install AppGoat playbooks and MCP config
        env:
          APPGOAT_API_KEY: ${{ secrets.APPGOAT_API_KEY }}
        run: |
          git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/appgoat/skills /tmp/appgoat-skills
          mkdir -p .claude/skills
          cp -r /tmp/appgoat-skills/skills/* .claude/skills/
          # Hosted AppGoat MCP server; the key goes into a file, not the command line.
          jq -n --arg key "$APPGOAT_API_KEY" \
            '{mcpServers: {appgoat: {type: "http", url: "https://api.appgoat.ai/mcp", headers: {"x-api-key": $key}}}}' \
            > "$RUNNER_TEMP/appgoat-mcp.json"
      - uses: anthropics/claude-code-action@v1
        env:
          GH_TOKEN: ${{ github.token }}
        with:
          anthropic_api_key: ${{ secrets.ANTHROPIC_API_KEY }}
          prompt: |
            Use the find-app-ideas skill with niche "${{ inputs.niche }}" (empty = chart scan), store apple, country us.
            Open one GitHub issue titled "App ideas <YYYY-MM>" with the report as the body (gh issue create).
          claude_args: |
            --mcp-config ${{ runner.temp }}/appgoat-mcp.json
            --allowedTools mcp__appgoat__get_charts,mcp__appgoat__keyword_research,mcp__appgoat__get_app,mcp__appgoat__search_apps,mcp__appgoat__get_reviews,mcp__appgoat__get_job,Bash(gh issue create:*)

Claude Code routine:

text

/schedule monthly on the 1st at 09:00 - Run the find-app-ideas playbook for the niche "<niche>" on the App Store, US. Compare with last month's picks (in ideas/), highlight new entries and dropped ones, and save the report as ideas/<YYYY-MM>.md.