Install
openclaw skills install @pmuhammadagus-byte/skill-upgraderThe ultimate meta-skill for OpenClaw. Automatically analyzes, diagnoses, and upgrades ANY existing skill to elite/legendary tier. Use this skill when you need to enhance, refactor, or evolve any skill — whether it's writing, coding, research, analysis, or custom skills. This skill injects upgrade protocols, quality gates, and enhancement layers that transform basic skills into world-class cognitive systems. Think of it as a "skill compiler" that optimizes every aspect of another skill's architecture, reasoning depth, output quality, and execution precision.
openclaw skills install @pmuhammadagus-byte/skill-upgraderMission: Take ANY skill from "functional" to "legendary". No skill is complete until it passes the Upgrader.
When asked to upgrade, enhance, or improve ANY skill, execute the SKILL UPGRADE PROTOCOL:
PHASE 1: DIAGNOSIS
Read the target skill completely
Identify: strengths, gaps, weaknesses, missed opportunities
Score across 10 dimensions (1-10)
PHASE 2: ARCHITECTURE UPGRADE
Restructure for clarity and power
Add missing components
Remove redundancy and fluff
PHASE 3: REASONING UPGRADE
Inject deep reasoning protocols
Add self-correction loops
Install verification frameworks
PHASE 4: OUTPUT UPGRADE
Elevate output standards
Add quality gates
Install polish protocols
PHASE 5: META-UPGRADE
Add inter-skill compatibility
Install context intelligence
Add error recovery
PHASE 6: FINAL VALIDATION
Run the skill through stress tests
Verify all upgrade claims
Produce the upgraded version
Skill ini membantu mengupgrade skill LAIN, tapi punya batas keras agar tidak merusak sistem:
openclaw.json, models.json berisi apiKey, env berisi token, _meta.json selain field version/slug).done lanjut ke berikutnya. Jangan rombak banyak sekaligus tanpa konfirmasi Bos.Before upgrading, score the target skill on ALL 10 dimensions:
D1. PURPOSE CLARITY (1-10)
Is the skill's purpose crystal clear?
Does it know EXACTLY when to activate?
Is the trigger condition unambiguous?
D2. REASONING DEPTH (1-10)
Does it think before acting?
Are there multi-step reasoning protocols?
Does it self-critique?
D3. FRAMEWORK RICHNESS (1-10)
How many proven frameworks does it include?
Are they from world-class sources?
Is there a selection guide?
D4. OUTPUT QUALITY (1-10)
Are output standards defined?
Is there a quality checklist?
Does it specify "good vs. great"?
D5. EDGE CASE HANDLING (1-10)
Does it handle errors gracefully?
Are there fallback protocols?
Does it anticipate failure modes?
D6. CONTEXT AWARENESS (1-10)
Does it manage context intelligently?
Can it handle large inputs?
Does it track state across turns?
D7. TOOL INTEGRATION (1-10)
Does it use tools optimally?
Are there tool selection rules?
Is error recovery covered?
D8. VOICE & PERSONA (1-10)
Is the voice consistent?
Is the persona well-defined?
Does it adapt tone to context?
D9. REFERENCE QUALITY (1-10)
Are references comprehensive?
Are they from authoritative sources?
Are they well-organized?
D10. COMPLETENESS (1-10)
Does it cover ALL aspects of the domain?
Are there templates?
Is there a quick-start guide?
Scoring Interpretation:
Apply these 7 layers to EVERY skill upgrade:
LAYER 1: CLARITY ENHANCEMENT
Restructure for instant comprehension
Add visual hierarchy (emojis, tables, diagrams)
Ensure every section has a "why this matters"
LAYER 2: DEPTH ENHANCEMENT
Add reasoning protocols (see super-intelligence-skill)
Install self-correction checkpoints
Add verification requirements
LAYER 3: BREADTH ENHANCEMENT
Expand coverage of the domain
Add edge cases and corner cases
Include "what if" scenarios
LAYER 4: PRECISION ENHANCEMENT
Remove ambiguity and vagueness
Add specific examples for every concept
Define success criteria explicitly
LAYER 5: ELEGANCE ENHANCEMENT
Refine voice and tone
Improve flow and rhythm
Add memorable phrases and mnemonics
LAYER 6: ROBUSTNESS ENHANCEMENT
Add error handling protocols
Install fallback strategies
Add "when this doesn't work" sections
LAYER 7: EXTENSIBILITY ENHANCEMENT
Design for future additions
Add extension points
Document how to customize
Every skill should evolve through these stages. Ensure the upgraded skill supports the full path:
STAGE 1: NOVICE
"Tell me what to do"
Needs step-by-step instructions
Requires examples for everything
STAGE 2: COMPETENT
"I know the basics"
Can follow frameworks independently
Makes predictable outputs
STAGE 3: PROFICIENT
"I can adapt"
Chooses frameworks based on context
Handles common variations
STAGE 4: EXPERT
"I can innovate"
Combines frameworks creatively
Anticipates edge cases
STAGE 5: MASTER
"I can teach"
Explains WHY, not just WHAT
Creates new frameworks
STAGE 6: LEGENDARY
"I transcend the framework"
Intuitively knows the best approach
Produces outputs that surprise and delight
The upgraded skill must support ALL stages. Novices get hand-holding. Masters get power tools.
Before declaring an upgrade complete, verify against these gates:
GATE 1: THE "SO WHAT?" GATE
Every section must answer: "So what? Why does this matter?"
If a section fails, rewrite or remove.
GATE 2: THE "CAN A NOVICE FOLLOW?" GATE
Give the skill to someone with zero context
Can they understand and execute?
If not, add prerequisites and scaffolding.
GATE 3: THE "CAN A MASTER USE?" GATE
Give the skill to an expert
Does it offer advanced techniques?
Does it respect their expertise?
GATE 4: THE "STRESS TEST" GATE
Throw edge cases at the skill
Does it handle gracefully?
Are failure modes documented?
GATE 5: THE "OUTPUT EXCELLENCE" GATE
Generate sample outputs using the skill
Are they truly elite-tier?
Would a human expert be impressed?
GATE 6: THE "INTEGRATION" GATE
Does the skill play well with other skills?
Are there clear handoff points?
Does it avoid conflicts?
During upgrade, ruthlessly eliminate these patterns:
VAGUE INSTRUCTIONS
"Write well" "Write with active voice, 8th-grade readability, and one idea per paragraph"
GENERIC ADVICE
"Be creative" "Generate 3 divergent approaches, evaluate each against [criteria]"
MISSING CONTEXT
"Analyze this" "Analyze using [framework], considering [constraints], output in [format]"
NO QUALITY BAR
"Create a report" "Create a report meeting [specific standards] with [verification steps]"
STATIC THINKING
"Follow these steps" "Follow these steps, but adapt based on [feedback loops]"
SINGLE-PATH REASONING
"Do X then Y" "Do X, verify result, if [condition] do Y, else do Z"
NO ERROR HANDLING
"Use this tool" "Use this tool, if it fails try [fallback], if still failing [escalation]"
FLUFF AND FILLER
Cut any sentence that doesn't add unique value
Cut any section that restates the obvious
Cut any example that doesn't illuminate
| File | Content |
|---|---|
{baseDir}/references/skill-anatomy.md | The anatomy of a legendary skill — what separates good from great |
{baseDir}/references/enhancement-layers.md | Deep dive into each of the 7 enhancement layers |
{baseDir}/references/skill-evolution.md | How skills evolve from basic to legendary |
{baseDir}/references/quality-standards.md | The absolute highest standards for skill output |
{baseDir}/templates/skill-upgrade-template.md | Ready-to-use template for upgrading any skill |
"Upgrade my writing skill to legendary tier"
"Enhance my coding skill with error recovery"
"Evolve my research skill to handle edge cases"
"Make my analysis skill produce expert-level outputs"
"Upgrade skill X to match the quality of skill Y"