Install
openclaw skills install @mohitagw15856/executive-summaryWrite an executive summary for any document, report, or proposal. Use when asked to write an executive summary, management summary, briefing paper, or one-pager for senior stakeholders. Produces a structured summary that busy executives can read in under 3 minutes and act on.
openclaw skills install @mohitagw15856/executive-summaryWrites executive summaries that busy decision-makers actually read — front-loaded with conclusions, structured for skimming, ruthless about what to include.
An executive summary is NOT a summary of the document. It is a standalone document that:
Executive Summary Prepared for: [Audience] | Date: [Date] | Author: [Name]
Bottom line up front: [The most important thing. The recommendation or finding. 2-3 sentences. A reader who only reads this should know what you are asking or telling them.]
Background (why this matters): [2-3 sentences. Minimum context to understand the bottom line. Not the history — just what the reader needs now.]
Key findings / analysis:
Options considered: (include only if a decision is being presented)
| Option | Benefit | Risk | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| [Option A] | [Benefit] | [Risk] | Recommended |
| [Option B] | [Benefit] | [Risk] | Not recommended |
Recommendation: [Specific. "We recommend [action] because [reason]. This will [outcome]." Not "we suggest consideration of options."]
Immediate next steps:
Risks of inaction: [What happens if the reader does nothing]
Full report: [Reference to where the full document can be found]
CEO/MD: Lead with financial or strategic impact. 1 page. Make the decision binary. Ask in sentence one. Board: Lead with governance or risk. Frame against organisational objectives. State specifically what you need from them. Investor: Lead with return or opportunity. Specific numbers. 1 page. Anticipate "why now." Minister/senior public sector: Lead with public benefit or policy alignment. Include cost-benefit framing. Client: Lead with their problem. Show you understand before presenting recommendation.
Score any output of this skill before handing it over; 32+ is ship-quality.
| Dimension | 0 | 5 | 10 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bottom line placement | Conclusion appears only at the end, after chronological summary | Recommendation appears early but hedged, or split across sections | The ask or finding is unambiguous within the first three sentences and repeated nowhere it doesn't need to be |
| Standalone completeness | Unreadable without the source document; leans on unexplained references | Mostly standalone but assumes context the named audience may lack | A reader with no other material can understand the situation and decide from this page alone |
| Actionability | "Options for consideration" with no owners, dates, or stated ask | Recommendation is specific but next steps lack owners or dates | Specific recommendation, next steps each with owner and date, and risks of inaction quantified |
| Audience fit & length | Author-priority framing, over the length limit | Fits the limit but framing is generic — same summary would go to any audience | Framed to the named audience's decision context (financial/governance/return/policy) and within the limit |