Install
openclaw skills install @mariokarras/abm-product-marketing-contextWhen the user wants to create or update their product marketing context document. Also use when the user mentions 'product context,' 'service context,' 'marketing context,' 'set up context,' 'positioning,' 'who is my target audience,' 'describe my product,' 'describe my service,' 'ICP,' 'ideal customer profile,' or wants to avoid repeating foundational information across marketing tasks. Works for products, services, or hybrid offerings — B2B and B2C. Use this at the start of any new project before using other marketing skills — it creates .agents/product-marketing-context.md that all other skills reference for offering, audience, and positioning context.
openclaw skills install @mariokarras/abm-product-marketing-contextYou help users create and maintain a product marketing context document. This captures foundational positioning and messaging information that other marketing skills reference, so users don't repeat themselves. Works for products, services, or hybrid offerings — B2B and B2C alike.
The document is stored at .agents/product-marketing-context.md.
First, check if .agents/product-marketing-context.md already exists. Also check .claude/product-marketing-context.md for older setups — if found there but not in .agents/, offer to move it.
If it exists:
If it doesn't exist, offer two options:
Auto-draft from codebase (recommended): You'll study the repo—README, landing pages, marketing copy, package.json, etc.—and draft a V1 of the context document. The user then reviews, corrects, and fills gaps. This is faster than starting from scratch.
Start from scratch: Walk through each section conversationally, gathering info one section at a time.
Most users prefer option 1. After presenting the draft, ask: "What needs correcting? What's missing?"
If auto-drafting:
If starting from scratch: Walk through each section below conversationally, one at a time. Don't dump all questions at once.
For each section:
Push for verbatim customer language — exact phrases are more valuable than polished descriptions because they reflect how customers actually think and speak, which makes copy more resonant.
Question design — reduce friction, get better answers:
→ *pattern*: annotations to indicate which pattern to use — these are instructions for you, not text to show the user.Important: Adapt to offering type. Section 1 establishes whether this is a product, service, or hybrid — and whether it's B2B or B2C. Use that to guide which questions you emphasize and which you skip in all subsequent sections. Don't force product language on a service business, and don't ask B2C founders about buying committees. If the user doesn't explicitly label their offering type, infer it from their description ("we send doctors to your house" → service; "we built an app" → product; "we sell boxes and have a companion app" → hybrid) and confirm: "It sounds like this is a B2C service — is that right?"
If the user is setting this up on behalf of someone else (consultant, agency, new hire), ask what they know and flag sections that need input from the founder or customer-facing team. Mark those sections as "[needs founder input]" in the output.
Priority guide: Sections 1-6 are essential — they form the core that downstream skills depend on. Sections 7-12 are high-value but can be marked "[to revisit]" if the user runs out of time or patience. Always capture 1-6 before moving to 7-12.
Adapt these fields based on offering type:
For B2B:
For B2C:
For all:
Capture 2-4 distinct personas — the people who interact with your offering. Think about who uses it, who pays for it, and who influences the choice — these may be different people.
For B2B — organizational buying roles:
For B2C — user segments and decision stakeholders:
For each persona, capture: what they care about, their challenge, and the value you promise them.
Example: "The Family Decision-Maker — cares about safety and trust, challenged by navigating confusing care options, we promise peace of mind and vetted professionals."
Help the user think in three tiers — show examples for each to unblock them:
Prompt: "Name 1-2 for each tier. If you're not sure, think about what your customers were doing before they found you — that's your indirect competitor."
Compile the JTBD Four Forces from what you've already captured — do NOT re-ask questions the user already answered:
Present your compiled draft of all four forces and ask: "Does this capture the dynamics? What's missing?" Only probe for Habit and Anxiety directly — Push and Pull should already be covered.
For early-stage companies with few customers: "How would your ideal customer describe this problem to a friend? Just make it up — what would they say?"
/brand-voice expands to 3-5 with full examples): for each, capture what it means and what it does NOT mean. E.g., "Approachable — friendly and jargon-free, but not dumbed-down or overly casual"When is this section enough? For most teams, these essentials are sufficient — downstream skills can produce consistent content from this. Run /brand-voice when you need grammar/style rules, detailed terminology governance, channel-by-channel tone tables, or have multiple writers who need a shared reference document.
For early-stage: "What proof do you have so far, even if small? Anything counts — beta user feedback, waitlist numbers, founder credentials, a pilot result."
After gathering information, create .agents/product-marketing-context.md with this structure:
# Product Marketing Context
*Last updated: [date]*
## Offering Overview
**Company/brand:**
**One-liner:**
**What it does:**
**Why it exists:**
**Category:**
**Offering type:**
**Stage:**
**Business model & pricing:**
**Delivery model:** *(if service/hybrid)*
**Coverage area:** *(if service/hybrid)*
## Target Audience
**Target customers:**
**Who decides:**
**How they find us:**
**Where they spend time:**
**How they buy:**
**Primary use case:**
**Jobs to be done:**
-
**Use cases:**
-
## Personas
| Persona | Cares about | Challenge | Value we promise |
|---------|-------------|-----------|------------------|
| | | | |
## Problems & Pain Points
**Core problem:**
**Why alternatives fall short:**
-
**What it costs them:**
**Emotional tension:**
## Competitive Landscape
**Direct:** [Competitor] — falls short because...
**Secondary:** [Approach] — falls short because...
**Indirect:** [Alternative] — falls short because...
## Differentiation
**Key differentiators:**
-
**How we do it differently:**
**Why that's better:**
**Why customers choose us:**
## Objections
| Objection | Response |
|-----------|----------|
| | |
**Anti-persona:**
## Switching Dynamics
**Push:**
**Pull:**
**Habit:**
**Anxiety:**
## Customer Language
**How they describe the problem:**
- "[verbatim]"
**How they describe us:**
- "[verbatim]"
**Words to use:**
**Words to avoid:**
**Glossary:**
| Term | Meaning |
|------|---------|
| | |
## Brand Voice
**Personality:** [3-5 adjectives + one-sentence character sketch]
**Voice attributes:**
| Attribute | We are | We are not |
|-----------|--------|------------|
| | | |
**Tone direction:**
**Voice do's:**
**Voice don'ts:**
**Sample sentence:**
**Tone shifts:** [how voice adapts by audience or channel]
## Proof Points
**Metrics:**
**Customers/Credentials:**
**Testimonials:**
> "[quote]" — [who]
**Value themes:**
| Theme | Proof |
|-------|-------|
| | |
## Goals
**Business goal:**
**Conversion action:**
**Current metrics:**
.agents/product-marketing-context.md/product-marketing-context anytime to update it."