Back to skill

Security audit

Aim Budget Faq

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

This is a Chinese-language FAQ skill for an internal AIM budget rules document, with no code execution, persistence, credential use, or hidden data handling found.

Before installing, users should treat the FAQ as internal budget-rule reference material and verify high-impact budget decisions against the current official制度 document or finance department, especially if the underlying policy version changes.

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
  • Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
  • Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
  • Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
  • Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs
Vulnerability Patterns
  • Trigger AbuseOverly Broad Trigger, Shadow Command Trigger, Keyword Baiting Trigger
  • Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
  • Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
  • Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
  • Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code
Findings (4)

Vague Triggers

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
93% confidence
Finding

The trigger list ends with '其他关于AIM预算体系的疑问', which is a broad natural-language catch-all rather than a specific invocation boundary. This makes activation scope less precise because it does not clarify what kinds of AIM-adjacent questions are in or out of scope, increasing the chance of unintended invocation.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
95% confidence
Finding

This markdown file contains all user-facing natural language in Chinese, and there is no indication that the skill supports other languages or that Chinese is a required, justified locale. Under the policy rule, forcing a specific language without user opt-in is a natural-language policy violation.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
89% confidence
Finding

This markdown file presents all user-facing contact information in Chinese and does not provide an alternative language option or state that the content is intentionally limited to a Chinese-speaking audience. Under the policy, forcing a specific language without user opt-in can be a natural-language policy violation.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
85% confidence
Finding

This markdown file contains user-facing natural language exclusively in Chinese and does not state that the language is optional or region-specific. Under the policy rule for language or locale constraints, forcing a specific language without user opt-in can be a violation.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.