ClawHub
Back to skill

Security audit

FAQ Generator From Reviews

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

This is a simple FAQ-drafting skill that uses user-provided ecommerce reviews and questions, with no code, persistence, or hidden access.

Installers should understand this skill as a drafting aid for ecommerce FAQ content. Provide relevant reviews, Q&A, and product facts, and manually verify any claims or evidence before publishing, especially for performance, health, refund, or shipping statements.

A.I.G

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
  • Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
  • Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
  • Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
  • Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs

SkillSpector

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Trigger AbuseOverly Broad Trigger, Shadow Command Trigger, Keyword Baiting Trigger
  • Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
  • Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
  • Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
  • Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code
Findings (2)

Vague Triggers

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
91% confidence
Finding

The description says to use the skill when teams want clearer answers from customer language, which is broad and does not define clear trigger phrases, scope limits, or non-applicable cases. In a manifest/markdown context, this can cause the skill to match many general content-improvement requests rather than a narrowly defined FAQ-from-reviews task.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
96% confidence
Finding

The instructional content is entirely in Chinese and does not state that language is optional or region-specific. This creates a natural-language policy concern because the skill appears to impose a specific language/locale without user opt-in.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Static analysis

No suspicious patterns detected.