Back to skill

Security audit

Stop Slop Zh

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

This is a markdown-only Chinese writing style guide with broad activation wording but no code execution, data access, persistence, or hidden behavior.

Install this if you want an agent to polish Chinese prose for a less AI-like style. Be careful using it on legal, contractual, academic, policy, or exact-preservation text, because its style rules may remove wording that is intentionally formal or precise.

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
  • Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
  • Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
  • Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
  • Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs
Vulnerability Patterns
  • Trigger AbuseOverly Broad Trigger, Shadow Command Trigger, Keyword Baiting Trigger
  • Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
  • Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
  • Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
  • Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code
Findings (4)

Vague Triggers

High
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
97% confidence
Finding

The skill declares an extremely broad trigger covering essentially any Chinese writing task and says such tasks 'must' invoke this skill. In agent environments, this can cause over-activation, hijack normal task routing, and apply rewriting behavior to unrelated or sensitive content, increasing the chance of instruction interference or unintended modification of user output.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
92% confidence
Finding

The skill is written to enforce Chinese-writing behavior across broad scenarios without an explicit user choice or opt-in. This can override user preferences, cause inappropriate language/style transformations, and reduce reliability when the task requires preserving original language, terminology, or format.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
85% confidence
Finding

The title explicitly frames the guidance as a blacklist for '中文 AI' phrasing, establishing a Chinese-only language constraint. Because the document does not offer an opt-in or clarify that this is a region- or language-specific reference, it may violate language/locale policy expectations for user choice.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
94% confidence
Finding

The title explicitly frames the content as a Chinese-only writing blacklist, setting a language-specific constraint. There is no indication that users may opt into another language or that the locale restriction is documented as a justified regional requirement.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Static analysis

No suspicious patterns detected.