Taste Claritas

A formal observation framework derived from Aquinas's three conditions of beauty — integritas, consonantia, and claritas — as a perceptual checklist for composition analysis.

Install

openclaw skills install @johnnyzijianwu/taste-claritas

Taste Claritas

A taste skill derived from Thomas Aquinas's three conditions of beauty (Summa Theologica I, q.39, a.8): integritas (wholeness — nothing essential missing), consonantia (due proportion — parts relate correctly to whole), and claritas (radiance — form shines through matter with luminous intelligibility).

Style Tokens

  • Luminous intelligibility — the organizing principle visible through material
  • Geometric proportion as structural logic, not decoration
  • Encyclopedic completeness — nothing essential missing
  • Nothing excess, nothing missing — economy without poverty
  • Form transparent to principle
  • Even illumination revealing structure
  • Architectural clarity of spatial relationships
  • Ratio as method — mathematical proportion governing composition
  • Legibility without simplification
  • Splendor formae — the radiance of form itself

Anti-Tokens

  • Decorative ornament as end in itself
  • Deliberate obscurity or mystification
  • Asymmetric expressionism prioritizing feeling over structure
  • Rough texture valued for its own sake
  • Incompleteness as aesthetic choice
  • Emotional turbulence disrupting formal logic
  • Baroque excess overwhelming structural clarity
  • Subjective distortion of proportion
  • Darkness as mood rather than structural element
  • Fragmentation without governing unity

Application Rules

  1. Apply integritas check: identify what is essential — is anything missing that creates deficiency? Is anything present that does not serve the whole?
  2. Apply consonantia check: do proportional relationships follow a consistent structural logic? Can you identify the ratio governing spatial divisions?
  3. Apply claritas check: does the organizing principle become legible through the material — can you see through surface to structure?
  4. Use as sequential diagnostic: if a composition feels off but you cannot identify why, check these three conditions in order
  5. Check each condition independently — failure is usually in one specific condition, not all three

Evaluation Criteria

  • Does the composition achieve completeness without excess?
  • Can you identify the proportional system governing spatial relationships?
  • Does the organizing principle shine through the material surface?
  • Is there luminous intelligibility — can you grasp the whole at once?
  • Would removing any element create a deficiency? Would adding any element create excess?