Patent Software Ip

Generate CN patent docs (claims, specification, abstract) and software copyright materials from AI/big-data project code or docs. Covers 7 AI domains + big data, 11 claim templates, auto domain detection, desensitization, prior-art search, and self-check.

Patent & Software Copyright Generation (AI + Big Data)

Generate CNIPA invention patent documents or CPCC software copyright materials from AI / big-data project code, design docs, and research papers.

Covers 7 AI domains + Big Data (23 sub-directions), 11 claim templates.

Full version (Chinese, with Word/PPT output): see AI-Copyright-Skill project.

Triggers

patent / claims / specification / software copyright / disclosure / IP application / paper-to-patent / /patent-software-ip

Overall Flow

text

Phase A  Requirement Diagnosis -> path + domain classification + risk level
Phase B  Project Analysis -> auto-detect domain + extract key technical points
Phase C  Generation (branch by path)
  C1 Patent: prior art search -> claims (11 templates) -> specification -> abstract -> self-check
  C2 Software Copyright: manual -> source code doc -> self-check
Phase D  Iterative Correction

Phase A: Requirement Diagnosis

Confirm: path (patent/copyright/both), tech topic, applicant/inventor info, existing materials.

Auto domain classification (see Section "AI Domain Taxonomy" below).

Gate: 3-5 line diagnosis summary including domain + risk level.

AI Domain Taxonomy

Domain	Sub-directions	High-Risk Flags
D1 Perceptual Intelligence	2D vision, 3D vision, multi-sensor fusion	3D vision: bind 4-stage pipeline
D2 Cognition & Language	NLP, multimodal LLM, RAG, knowledge graph	RAG: show full 5-stage chain
D3 Generative AI	Diffusion, LLM text gen, cross-modal gen, AIGC watermark	Must bind condition injection method; pure content gen = rejected
D4 Decision & Interaction	Embodied AI, reinforcement learning, multi-agent	Must bind sensor + actuator; RL: bind reward to concrete task
D5 AI Engineering	Training/fine-tuning, inference deployment, data engineering, edge IoT	Training: bind to specific model architecture; inference: bind to hardware
D6 AI Safety & Governance	Adversarial robustness, watermark/tracing, privacy, alignment	Need concrete technical measure, not policy-level description
D7 Industry Applications	Autonomous driving, industrial, medical, financial, AI4Science	Must bind data processing means; financial: bind to data analysis
D8 Big Data	Distributed computing, data pipeline, stream processing, data quality, real-time analytics	Must bind to specific application scenario; pure platform = rejected

Phase B: Project Analysis

B.1 Auto-Detection Decision Tree

Source files -> domain mapping:

Key file	Detected domain
model.py, unet.py, vae.py	D3 Generative AI
train.py, finetune.py	D5 AI Engineering (Training)
inference.py, triton_serve.py, onnx_export.py	D5 AI Engineering (Inference)
render.py, gaussian.py, splat.py	D1 3D Vision
llm.py, chat.py, rag_chain.py	D2 NLP / RAG
robot.py, vla.py, env.py	D4 Embodied AI
reward.py, ppo.py	D4 Reinforcement Learning
watermark.py, embed_watermark.py	D6 AI Safety / Watermark
spark_job.py, flink_job.py, kafka_consumer.py	D8 Big Data
etl.py, data_pipeline.py, feature_store.py	D8 Big Data (Data Engineering)
stream.py, realtime_analytics.py	D8 Big Data (Streaming)
dataset.py, dataloader.py	D5 AI Engineering (Data)
privacy.py, dp_train.py	D6 AI Safety (Privacy)
config.yaml, pipeline.py + langchain	D2 RAG / Agent

Also detect 6 industry contexts: medical, financial, autonomous driving, industrial, smart city, education.

B.2 Technical Points Extraction

Priority: model definition -> training/inference -> domain-specific core -> papers/design docs -> README.

Output: Key Points List (innovations, scheme skeleton, key params, distinctions, quantifiable effects, domain classification).

Gate: Present key points list for user confirmation.

Phase C1: Patent Application

C1.1 Prior Art Search

Online search 2-3 rounds: CNIPA patent DB, Google Patents, arXiv. Each result: source ID, scheme summary, limitations.

CPC suggestions by domain:

• D1 3D Vision: G06T 7/50, G06T 17/00
• D2 NLP/RAG: G06F 40/30, G06N 3/08
• D3 Generative AI: G06N 3/045, G06T 13/00
• D4 Embodied: G05B 19/00, B25J 9/16
• D5 AI Engineering: G06N 3/084
• D6 AI Safety: G06F 21/60
• D7 Industry: varies by sector
• D8 Big Data: G06F 16/245, G06F 16/903

C1.2 Claims (11 Templates)

Structure: Method (1 independent + 3-8 dependent) + System (1 independent + 3-8 dependent) + Storage Medium (1 independent).

Template selection by domain:

Template	Domain	Independent claim skeleton
T1 Model Architecture	D1/D2/D5	Predefined network -> layer composition -> feature extraction -> output
T2 3D Vision	D1 3D	Capture -> sparse reconstruction -> dense optimization -> rendering (expand formula)
T3 Training Strategy	D5	Data construction -> model initialization -> loss design -> optimization -> convergence
T4 Multimodal Fusion	D1/D2	Multi-modal input -> modality-specific encoding -> cross-modal alignment -> fused output
T5 RAG Pipeline	D2	Parse -> retrieve -> rerank -> reconstruct -> generate
T6 Diffusion Model	D3	Noise scheduling -> condition injection (specify: cross-attention/adapter/ControlNet) -> denoising -> decode
T7 Agent	D2/D4	Environment perception -> task decomposition -> tool selection -> execution -> feedback
T8 Embodied Intelligence	D4	Sensor input -> perception -> planning -> actuator output + safety constraint (dependent)
T9 Inference Optimization	D5	Model loading -> computation graph optimization -> kernel fusion -> output
T10 Big Data Processing	D8	Data ingestion -> distributed processing (specify: Spark/Flink/MapReduce) -> aggregation -> storage/output
T11 Data Engineering & Quality	D8	Data collection -> quality assessment -> anomaly detection -> cleaning -> feature extraction -> storage

Drafting rules (all domains):

1. Method + System claims in pairs
2. Independent: preamble (prior art) + "characterized by" (essential features)
3. Dependent: "according to claim X..." with further limitation
4. Every step must link to system component
5. Avoid functional limitation; prefer structural/step-based description
6. Quantify effects where possible ("improves accuracy by X%", "reduces latency to Y ms")

C1.3 Specification

5-chapter: Tech Field -> Background (prior art + defects) -> Invention Content (problem + scheme + effects, quantified) -> Figure Description -> Specific Embodiments.

Desensitization:

• Dataset name -> "preset dataset"
• Parameter count -> "preset-scale model"
• Hardware -> "graphics processor" / "distributed computing node"
• Training duration -> "preset period"
• Framework -> "DL framework" / "distributed computing framework"
• API -> "remote interface"
• Company -> "institution"
• Specific values -> ranges

Figures (mermaid flowchart TB/LR): System architecture + method flow + domain-specific pipeline (training/rendering/data pipeline/stream topology/etc.).

C1.4 Abstract

<=300 chars. Tech domain + core scheme + main effect. No commercial terms.

C1.5 Self-Check

• Independent claim contains all essential features
• Dependent claims correctly reference
• Method + System + Medium triple complete
• Specification sufficiently disclosed (enabling)
• Embodiments cover all claim features
• Beneficial effects quantified
• Terminology consistent throughout
• Abstract corresponds to claim 1
• Desensitization complete (no company/person/business name leak)
• Figure numbering consistent
• Domain-specific checks passed (see below)

Domain-specific self-check:

Domain	Extra checks
D1 3D Vision	Rendering formula in claim? 4-stage pipeline?
D2 NLP/RAG	Full 5-stage RAG chain? Specific embedding model?
D3 Generative AI	Condition injection method specified? Not pure content gen?
D4 Embodied	Sensor + actuator bound in every step? Safety dependent claim?
D5 AI Engineering	Specific model architecture? Hardware binding for inference?
D6 AI Safety	Concrete technical measure? Not policy-level?
D7 Financial/Medical	Data processing means bound? Not pure business method?
D8 Big Data	Specific application scenario bound? Not pure platform? Distributed topology described?

Phase C2: Software Copyright

C2.1 Software Manual (10-15 pages, >=6 screenshots)

Structure: Introduction (env + capability) -> Installation (env + weights + config) -> Functions (core + data + API + monitoring) -> Non-functional -> FAQ.

Templates by domain:

• General AI: standard template
• 3D Vision: add rendering/visualization section
• Generative AI: add sampling/inference section
• Embodied AI: add sensor/hardware integration section
• Big Data: add data pipeline/deployment section (distributed topology, cluster config, streaming topology diagram)

C2.2 Source Code Document (front 30 + back 30 pages, >=50 lines/page)

File priority by domain:

Domain	Required files	Domain-specific required
D1 3D Vision	model.py, train.py, inference.py, render.py	render.py
D2 NLP/RAG	model.py, train.py, inference.py, retriever.py	retriever.py
D3 Generative AI	model.py, train.py, inference.py, generate.py	generate.py
D4 Embodied	model.py, train.py, inference.py, control.py, env.py	control.py
D5 AI Engineering	model.py, finetune.py, export.py, deploy.py	finetune.py
D6 AI Safety	model.py, watermark.py, adv_train.py	watermark.py
D8 Big Data	pipeline.py, etl.py, stream.py, config.yaml	pipeline.py

<3000 lines: submit all; >3000: front 1500 + back 1500 by priority.

Desensitization: Remove API keys, absolute paths, internal addresses, personal info, hardware models, cloud URLs, DB passwords. Retain algorithm comments.

C2.3 Self-Check

• Pages >= 15
• Screenshots >= 6
• Feature coverage complete
• Non-technical description for reviewers
• Code pages with >= 50 lines/page
• Name consistency
• No secret leaks

Knowledge Index

Deep-dive reference files for domain-specific patent writing rules, claim templates, and software copyright guides.

File	Sections	Key Content
eferences/ai-patent-claims-guide.md	11 claim templates (T1-T14)	Full legal claim text per template: method/system/medium triples with dependent claims; Big Data T10-T14 included
eferences/ai-patent-special.md	Patentability framework, 8 risk domains, CPC codes, desensitization rules	AI+Big Data patentability risk assessment; domain mapping; figure requirements; industry desensitization; CPC classification (7.1-7.7); 9-domain quick reference
eferences/ai-software-copyright-guide.md	Type detection, source file priority, 5 domain templates, FAQ	Decision tree for 10+ project types; source code priority by domain; Big Data dedicated template (section 3.5); desensitization checklist; common pitfalls

Phase D: Iterative Correction

Identify -> Locate -> Targeted fix -> Save as v{N} -> Re-run affected self-check items only. Do NOT re-run full pipeline.

Output

text

outputs/{case-id}/
  patent/          claims.md + specification.md + abstract.md + full.md
  software-copyright/  manual.md + source_code.md

Prohibitions: No skill name/repo path/disclaimers in deliverables. No self-check section in body. No fabricated patent numbers/links. No "approximately" in claims. No commercial terms in abstract.

Quick Reference: 8 High-Risk Rejection Patterns

Pattern	Why rejected	Fix
Pure content generation (no condition injection)	"Intellectual activity rules"	Specify cross-attention/adapter/ControlNet in claims
Financial AI without data processing means	"Business method"	Bind to specific feature engineering + model architecture
Embodied AI without sensor/actuator binding	"Pure algorithm"	Add "executed via LiDAR module" + "motor controller"
RAG without full pipeline	"Insufficient disclosure"	Show all 5 stages in method claim
Big Data platform without application	"Abstract idea"	Bind to specific scenario (e.g., real-time traffic analytics)
RL without reward function	"Insufficient disclosure"	Include reward computation formula
AI watermark without robustness test	"Insufficient technical effect"	Add adversarial/noise/compression robustness claim
Medical AI without clinical validation	"Insufficient enablement"	Add evaluation on specific dataset with clinical metrics