Install
openclaw skills install @fize/brand-identity-designEnd-to-end brand visual identity (VI) design methodology — a six-stage workflow from brand soul discovery to visual identity system building and multi-touchpoint brand manual delivery. Covers core concept, logo design, color strategy, typography, graphic language, and touchpoint application. Use when: designing brand identity, visual identity systems (VI), logo design, brand guidelines, or brand manuals. Keywords: brand identity, VI设计, 品牌视觉系统, 品牌VI, logo design, 品牌设计, 品牌手册, brand guidelines.
openclaw skills install @fize/brand-identity-designFull-cycle brand visual identity (VI) system design process. Each stage has a distinct role mindset, deliverables, and quality gates.
Switch into detective mode. Understand who the brand is and who it serves.
Go beyond demographics. Build a persona with emotions, pain points, aspirations, and behavioral patterns. Understand the emotional relationship users have with the category.
Analyze 3 main competitors' visual language — logo, color, typography, imagery. Look for the "visual gap": what territory no competitor owns, where the brand can claim unique visual real estate.
Identify all core scenarios where the brand meets users: website, app, packaging, social media, offline stores, customer service, events. Create a touchpoint matrix.
Switch into strategist mode. Translate insights into design principles.
A single unifying idea that guides all visual decisions. Examples: "Flowing Order", "Warmth of Technology", "Precision with Soul". Every design choice must trace back to this concept.
Define 3-5 descriptive keywords that capture the brand's character. Examples: Pioneering, Inclusive, Inspiring, Grounded, Bold. These become the filter for all creative decisions.
Plot the brand on key spectrums:
This quadrant becomes the north star for all visual decisions.
Switch into explorer mode. Generate bold directions, then converge.
Produce 2-3 differentiated visual directions. Each direction must include:
What analogy or symbol system carries the brand's essence? A leaf, a circuit board, a loom, a prism — the metaphor should be visually fertile.
Describe the first impression: color feel, texture quality, graphic style, typographic voice. Write it as if describing a mood to someone who can't see.
Which single element could become a supersign — instantly recognizable even without the logo? This is the visual hook that builds brand recall.
What's the biggest risk in execution? (e.g., "too abstract for the product category", "hard to reproduce in motion", "color system doesn't work for accessibility")
After exploration, converge using: alignment with brand strategy, differentiation from competitors, scalability across touchpoints, feasibility within constraints.
Switch into architect mode. Construct a scalable, coherent visual system.
| Component | Specifications |
|---|---|
| Logo & Identity | Clear space, minimum size, safe zones, incorrect usage examples |
| Color System | Primary, secondary, neutral, data-vis palettes + WCAG contrast verification |
| Typography | Brand typefaces (Latin + CJK), hierarchy scale, weight/leading/ tracking specs |
| Grid & Layout | Web grid, mobile grid, print grid — column math, gutter, margin ratios |
| Component | Guidelines |
|---|---|
| Graphic Language | Supporting graphics, patterns, textures, illustration style |
| Photography Direction | Mood, lighting, composition rules, subject matter guidelines |
| Motion Design | Animation principles, easing curves, duration hierarchy, transition patterns |
| Iconography | Style (outline/filled/duotone), stroke weight, corner radius, grid alignment |
Switch into narrator mode. Apply the system to real scenarios and verify it lives.
Apply to: website hero section, app main screen, social media templates. Verify the system works at different screen sizes and resolutions.
Apply to: business cards, brochure/catalog, packaging prototype. Verify the system works in physical form — paper stock, ink, embossing.
Apply to: logo animation / reveal, UI transition prototype, video title sequence. Verify the system works in time-based media.
For each touchpoint, verify:
Switch into guardian mode. Ensure the system is understood and used correctly.
A living document containing:
Document what NOT to do:
A narrative presentation that explains the "why" behind the system — helps internal teams and partners understand and embrace the identity.
When producing brand strategy output, ALWAYS use this structure:
# Brand Strategy: [Project Name]
## Stage Progress
- Current stage: [1|2|3|4|5|6]
- Previous gate passed: [stage gate name]
- Next gate to pass: [stage gate name]
## Strategic Foundation
- Core concept: [one sentence]
- Brand personality: [3-5 keywords]
- Competitive gap identified: [one sentence]
## Deliverables This Stage
- [Deliverable 1]: [description + key decisions]
- [Deliverable 2]: [description + key decisions]
## Rationale Log
| Decision | Strategic Basis | Alternatives Considered |
|----------|----------------|------------------------|
| [decision] | [link to strategy/user/competition] | [options with rejection reasons] |
## Quality Gate Status
- Ready for next stage? [YES/NO]
- Blockers: [list if any]
| Anti-Pattern | Why It's Harmful | What To Do Instead |
|---|---|---|
| Starting with logo sketches before research | Logo without brand strategy is just a picture | Complete Stage 1 and 2 first |
| Designing for personal taste instead of brand strategy | Inconsistent brand identity that doesn't serve business goals | Always reference the brand personality keywords and quadrant |
| Proposing colors without accessibility check | Exclusionary design that fails real users | Verify WCAG AA before including any color in the system |
| Creating isolated assets without system consideration | Each new piece requires rework instead of fitting into a coherent system | Design the foundation layer first, then express through it |
| Using "make it pop" as a creative brief | Ambiguous direction leads to wasted iterations | Use the six-stage process to ground every request in specific strategic language |
| Stage | Gate | Sign-off Criteria |
|---|---|---|
| 1 → 2 | Research complete | Competitive gaps identified, user personas validated |
| 2 → 3 | Strategy locked | Core concept and personality keywords approved |
| 3 → 4 | Direction selected | One visual direction chosen with rationale documented |
| 4 → 5 | System built | All foundation + expression layer components documented |
| 5 → 6 | Validated across 3+ touchpoints | All touchpoints pass recognition and differentiation checks |