Security audit

Design Assets Index

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

This skill is a low-risk directory of design-resource links with no executable behavior, persistence, or sensitive access.

Review whether a Chinese-language design-resource index fits your workflow, and be aware that it may be invoked for broad asset requests. It does not appear to run code or access private data.

A.I.G

Vulnerability Patterns

Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs

SkillSpector

Vulnerability Patterns

Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
Trigger AbuseOverly Broad Trigger, Shadow Command Trigger, Keyword Baiting Trigger
Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code

Findings (9)

Vague Triggers

Medium

Category: Not specified by scanner
Confidence: 96% confidence
Finding: The skill description contains very broad activation guidance such as using it whenever a user needs a ready-made asset, including generic requests like 'I need an image' or 'find me an icon'. This can cause the agent to invoke the skill for many ordinary design or content requests, creating prompt-routing overreach and increasing the chance the skill influences responses outside its narrow intended scope.
Content: No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium

Category: Not specified by scanner
Confidence: 96% confidence
Finding: The skill body begins in Chinese and frames the skill behavior in that language without any user opt-in, which can steer agent output or intermediate behavior toward a language the user did not request. While not directly enabling code execution or data exfiltration, it can degrade reliability, cause user-confusion, and create unintended behavior in multilingual contexts.
Content: No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low

Category: Not specified by scanner
Confidence: 89% confidence
Finding: The document title and descriptive headings/content are written in Chinese throughout, while the linked resources are primarily English. There is no indication that the skill is intentionally region-specific or that users can opt into another language, which may violate a language/locale policy requiring user choice or documented justification.
Content: No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low

Category: Not specified by scanner
Confidence: 91% confidence
Finding: This markdown file presents all headings and descriptive text in Chinese, with no indication that the skill is intended only for Chinese-speaking users or that alternative languages are available. Under the language/locale policy, forcing a specific language without user opt-in can be a natural-language policy violation.
Content: No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low

Category: Not specified by scanner
Confidence: 93% confidence
Finding: This markdown file uses Chinese for its title and descriptive text, which can amount to a language/locale constraint in the skill's natural-language content. The policy requires either a user opt-in for a specific language or a clear justification that the content is region- or locale-specific.
Content: No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low

Category: Not specified by scanner
Confidence: 96% confidence
Finding: The title and descriptive text are written in Chinese only, and the file does not indicate that language selection is optional or that the skill is intentionally region-specific. Under the stated policy, forcing a specific language without user opt-in is a natural-language policy violation.
Content: No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low

Category: Not specified by scanner
Confidence: 82% confidence
Finding: This markdown file presents the skill primarily in Chinese while many linked-item descriptions are only in English. That imposes a mixed-language experience without any stated user opt-in or language-selection guidance, which can violate a language/locale policy requiring explicit choice.
Content: No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low

Category: Not specified by scanner
Confidence: 92% confidence
Finding: The document title and introductory description are written in Chinese, while the linked resources are otherwise general-purpose and not clearly limited to a Chinese-speaking or region-specific audience. This can violate language/locale policy when a skill imposes a specific language without user choice or documented justification.
Content: No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low

Category: Not specified by scanner
Confidence: 80% confidence
Finding: This markdown file presents the title and section headings in Chinese while many descriptions and linked resource names are in English. Under the language/locale policy rule, forcing a particular language presentation without user opt-in or documented justification can be a policy issue.
Content: No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Static analysis

No suspicious patterns detected.