ClawHub
Back to skill

Security audit

应急方案技能

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

This is a Chinese emergency-plan drafting template skill with no executable code, network behavior, persistence, or hidden data access.

Before installing, users should know this is a Chinese emergency-plan drafting aid, not an official legal, medical, or safety authority. Any real emergency plan should be reviewed by qualified local personnel before use.

A.I.G

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
  • Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
  • Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
  • Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
  • Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs

SkillSpector

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Trigger AbuseOverly Broad Trigger, Shadow Command Trigger, Keyword Baiting Trigger
  • Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
  • Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
  • Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
  • Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code
Findings (3)

Vague Triggers

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
89% confidence
Finding

The skill uses broad trigger phrases such as '应急预案', '应急方案', and '灾害应对', which can cause unintended activation in loosely related conversations. While not directly enabling code execution or data exfiltration, overbroad invocation can steer the agent into providing procedural guidance when the user did not explicitly request this skill, increasing the chance of irrelevant, unsafe, or overconfident emergency-planning outputs in sensitive contexts.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
95% confidence
Finding

L157 的“支持中文交互”在该上下文中构成语言/locale 约束表述，但文档未说明用户可选择其他语言，也未给出明确的地区合规性理由。根据规则，强制或默认限定特定语言而缺少用户选择属于自然语言策略风险。

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
96% confidence
Finding

This markdown file contains user-facing instructions exclusively in Chinese, and nowhere indicates that the skill is region-specific or that users may choose another language. Under the stated policy, forcing a specific language without opt-in is a natural-language policy concern.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Static analysis

No suspicious patterns detected.