Back to skill

Security audit

Doc Formatter

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

This skill is a disclosed Chinese official-document drafting and formatting helper with no hidden code, persistence, or unrelated data access found.

Install this only if you want Chinese official-document drafting and GB/T 9704-style formatting. Review generated drafts manually before official use, avoid classified or confidential documents as the skill itself advises, and use export only for paths you intend to write.

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
  • Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
  • Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
  • Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
  • Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs
Vulnerability Patterns
  • Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
  • Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
  • Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
  • Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code
  • Excessive AgencyUnrestricted Tool Access, Autonomous Decision Making, Scope Creep
Findings (8)

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
93% confidence
Finding

The description states the skill performs automated generation of standardized Chinese official documents, which implies a fixed language/locale behavior. Under the policy, forcing a specific language without user opt-in is a natural-language policy violation unless the locale constraint is explicitly justified as region-specific or optional.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
93% confidence
Finding

The description explicitly frames the skill as generating standardized Chinese official documents, which imposes a specific language/locale behavior. The file does not offer user opt-in, alternative locales, or a documented justification that this locale restriction is required for a region-specific compliance workflow.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
95% confidence
Finding

The package description states the skill is for generating standardized Chinese official documents following a national Chinese formatting standard. This natural-language description imposes a specific language/locale context without indicating user choice, opt-in, or a clearly documented region-specific constraint in the file itself.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
92% confidence
Finding

The file states that the standards are based on GB/T 9704-2012 for Party and Government official documents, which establishes a specific Chinese official-document locale and formatting regime. Because the document does not present this as an opt-in or explicitly justify that the skill is only for China-specific official-document workflows, it can be read as a mandatory locale policy.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
93% confidence
Finding

This markdown file is scoped to 'official documents' and all exemplars are fixed to Chinese formal phrasing, with line L003 stating phrases are 'automatically matched' by the system. Combined with the normative language rules in L143-L146, this imposes a specific language/locale style without any opt-in or alternative language option, which matches the policy category for language or locale constraints.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
86% confidence
Finding

The examples for one-step generation use Chinese titles and recipients, and the guide consistently frames the skill around Chinese official-document workflows without stating that this is optional or region-specific. Under the policy rule, forcing or strongly implying a specific language/locale without user opt-in is a natural-language policy concern.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
91% confidence
Finding

The notice template requires a Chinese title format and provides only Chinese phrase templates, effectively steering output into a specific language. The file does not offer user opt-in, alternative locales, or explain that the skill is intentionally region- or language-specific.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
89% confidence
Finding

This section specifies a Chinese title format and Chinese stock phrases for approval requests, which constitutes a language/locale constraint. Because the template does not present this as an explicit user choice or justified region-specific behavior, it conflicts with the language-choice policy.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Static analysis

No suspicious patterns detected.