Repo Guardian

Automated GitHub PR review governance and repository maintenance automation. Use when reviewing pull requests with dual-model consensus, enforcing merge gates, auto-merging approved PRs, and triaging repo state on a cron schedule. Not for implementing issue fixes end-to-end (use gh-issues) or general GitHub CLI operations (use the github skill). Works on any GitHub repository.

Repo Guardian — Dual-Model PR Review & Issue Triage

Automated repository maintenance with cross-model review consensus.

Scope & Boundaries

Repo Guardian handles PR review governance and repo maintenance automation: reviewing PRs, enforcing quality via dual-model consensus, auto-merging when approved, and triaging repository state.

It is not the issue-to-fix implementation pipeline. If the job is to fetch issues, spawn coding agents, implement fixes, open PRs, and monitor review feedback, use gh-issues instead.

It is also not a general-purpose GitHub CLI toolkit. For direct gh CLI operations such as listing PRs, commenting, checking CI, or making ad hoc API queries, use the github skill.

NOT For

• Implementing issue fixes end-to-end — fetching issues, spawning coding agents, writing code, and opening PRs belongs to the gh-issues skill
• General GitHub CLI operations — listing PRs, commenting, checking CI, or ad-hoc gh queries belong to the github skill
• Code authoring or refactoring — Repo Guardian reviews and gates merges; it does not write new code

What It Does

Every 6 hours (configurable), Repo Guardian:

1. Checks for open PRs on the target repo
2. Reviews each PR with two independent models (Opus + GPT-5.4)
3. Merges if both models approve
4. Requests changes if either model finds issues
5. Optionally prepares follow-up remediation for review-discovered issues
6. Checks for open issues and triages them for the appropriate next step

Cron Setup

bash

# Run the guardian script via OpenClaw cron
# Add to ~/.openclaw/cron/jobs.json:
{
  "repo-guardian": {
    "schedule": "0 */6 * * *",
    "agent": "<your-agent-name>",
    "message": "Run repo-guardian for your-org/your-repo",
    "skill": "repo-guardian"
  }
}

Or run manually:

bash

bash <skill_dir>/scripts/guardian.sh your-org/your-repo

Review Process

PR Review (Dual-Model Consensus)

text

Open PR detected
  │
  ├─→ Opus reviews (security, architecture, correctness)
  ├─→ Sonnet reviews (code quality, edge cases, tests)
  │   (fallback: Haiku if Sonnet unavailable)
  │
  ├─ Both APPROVE → auto-merge (squash)
  ├─ One APPROVE, one REQUEST_CHANGES → post review comments, do not merge
  ├─ Both REQUEST_CHANGES → post review comments, do not merge
  └─ Either finds CRITICAL issue → post comments + label "needs-fix"

Issue Triage

text

Open issue detected
  │
  ├─ Assess complexity and routing (ready for automation vs needs human)
  ├─ Ready for implementation: hand off to the issue-fix pipeline (gh-issues)
  └─ Complex or unclear: add label "needs-human", post analysis comment

Review Criteria

Each model evaluates independently against:

1. Correctness — Does the code do what the PR claims?
2. Security — Any vulnerabilities, secret exposure, injection risks?
3. Tests — Are changes tested? Do existing tests still pass?
4. Scope — Does the PR stay within its stated purpose?
5. Quality — Code style, error handling, edge cases, naming

Each model returns a structured verdict:

json

{
  "verdict": "APPROVE|REQUEST_CHANGES|CRITICAL",
  "summary": "One-line summary",
  "findings": [
    {"severity": "critical|major|minor", "file": "...", "line": 0, "issue": "...", "fix": "..."}
  ],
  "confidence": "high|medium|low"
}

Configuration

Environment variables (set in shell or .env):

• GH_TOKEN — GitHub token with repo access (required)
• GUARDIAN_AGENT — OpenClaw agent name for Reviewer A (default: $OPENCLAW_AGENT or default)
• GUARDIAN_REVIEWER_B_AGENT — OpenClaw agent name for Reviewer B (default: same as GUARDIAN_AGENT; set to a different agent for true cross-model review)
• GUARDIAN_REPO — Default repo (e.g., your-org/your-repo)
• GUARDIAN_AUTO_MERGE — Enable auto-merge on consensus (true/false, default: true)
• GUARDIAN_AUTO_FIX — Enable auto-fix for issues (true/false, default: false)
• GUARDIAN_MAX_PRS — Max PRs to review per run (default: 5)
• GUARDIAN_MAX_ISSUES — Max issues to process per run (default: 3)

Data Flow & Privacy

Repo Guardian sends PR diffs and file listings to the configured OpenClaw agent models for review. This means:

• Repository code from open PRs is transmitted to your configured AI model providers (e.g., Anthropic, OpenAI) via the OpenClaw agent interface
• No data is sent to any third-party endpoint beyond your configured model providers
• Large diffs are truncated to 500 lines before transmission to limit exposure
• The GH_TOKEN is used only for GitHub API calls and is never passed to AI model prompts
• All JSON payloads to the GitHub API are constructed via Python json.dumps() to prevent injection

Recommended GH_TOKEN scopes: repo (read) for review-only mode; add repo (write) only if auto-merge is enabled. Use a fine-grained token scoped to the specific repository when possible.

Safety

• Never force-pushes or modifies protected branches
• Squash merges only — clean history
• Labels PRs with review status for audit trail
• Posts review comments with model attribution (which model said what)
• Requires dual consensus — single model cannot merge alone
• Skips PRs by org members marked with skip-guardian label
• Dry-run mode available (--dry-run flag)
• Credentials (GH_TOKEN) are user-configured via environment variables; Repo Guardian never stores, bundles, or transmits tokens
• Auto-merge requires explicit opt-in (GUARDIAN_AUTO_MERGE=true); disabled by default
• All review actions are logged with model attribution for full audit trail
• The skill operates only on the repository specified by the user; it does not discover or access other repos

Run Trace Logging

Each Repo Guardian run emits a structured trace for audit and performance tracking. After completing all PR reviews and issue triages, write a trace entry:

markdown

### [YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM] repo-guardian run
- **Repo:** [owner/repo]
- **PRs reviewed:** [count] (merged: N, changes requested: N, critical: N)
- **Issues triaged:** [count] (routed to gh-issues: N, labeled needs-human: N)
- **Model agreement rate:** [% of PRs where both models reached same verdict]
- **Duration:** [approx time]
- **Anomalies:** [any unexpected behavior, timeouts, model disagreements worth noting]

Write traces to memory/performance/skill-runs.md (following the standard skill execution logging protocol). The model agreement rate is a key health metric — if it drops below 70% over 5+ runs, the review criteria may need recalibration.

Models Used

Role	Primary	Fallback
Reviewer A	anthropic/claude-opus-4-6	anthropic/claude-sonnet-4-6
Reviewer B	anthropic/claude-sonnet-4-6	anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5
Issue triage	anthropic/claude-sonnet-4-6	anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5

Note: GPT-5.4 (openai-codex/gpt-5.4) can be used as Reviewer B if the OpenAI Codex agent is configured and available in your deployment. When using GPT, set Reviewer B primary to openai-codex/gpt-5.4 with fallback anthropic/claude-sonnet-4-6.

Requirements

Required environment variables:

• GH_TOKEN — A GitHub Personal Access Token. Must be set explicitly (the script will not fall back to gh auth token to avoid inadvertent scope leakage). Use a fine-grained PAT scoped to the specific target repository with read/write permissions for pull requests and issues.

Required binaries (must be on PATH):

• openclaw — OpenClaw CLI (dispatches review prompts to configured model agents)
• python3 — JSON construction and data parsing
• curl — GitHub API calls

Required OpenClaw configuration:

• At least one agent configured with access to Opus-tier and Sonnet/GPT-tier models for dual-model review