Back to skill

Security audit

合同一致性AI核对(免费版)

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

This skill is a local contract consistency checker that reads user-supplied contract text and does not show hidden network, persistence, credential, or destructive behavior.

Before installing, confirm you are comfortable running a local Node script on contract text. The tool appears to keep processing local, but its interface and results are mostly in Chinese and it is only a mechanical consistency checker, not legal advice.

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
  • Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
  • Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
  • Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
  • Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs
Vulnerability Patterns
  • Excessive AgencyUnrestricted Tool Access, Autonomous Decision Making, Scope Creep
  • MCP Tool PoisoningHidden Instructions, Unicode Deception, Parameter Description Injection
  • Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
  • Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
  • Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
Findings (8)

Ae1

High
Category
analysis-evasion
Confidence
100% confidence
Finding

Referenced artifact was not completely inspected

Content

Scanner excerpt · SKILL.md (reported line 68)May include surrounding context.

md
node scripts/run.mjs --sample

Ae1

High
Category
analysis-evasion
Confidence
100% confidence
Finding

Referenced artifact was not completely inspected

Content

Scanner excerpt · SKILL.md (reported line 69)May include surrounding context.

md
node scripts/run.mjs --sample

Ae1

High
Category
analysis-evasion
Confidence
100% confidence
Finding

Referenced artifact was not completely inspected

Content

Scanner excerpt · SKILL.md (reported line 70)May include surrounding context.

md
node scripts/run.mjs --sample

Ae1

High
Category
analysis-evasion
Confidence
100% confidence
Finding

Referenced artifact was not completely inspected

Content

Scanner excerpt · SKILL.md (reported line 75)May include surrounding context.

md
脚本本身不做判断,真正的检查在同目录的 `scripts/engine/contract-consistency.js`(纯 Node 标准库,CommonJS),可以直接引用:

Ae1

High
Category
analysis-evasion
Confidence
100% confidence
Finding

Referenced artifact was not completely inspected

Content

Scanner excerpt · SKILL.md (reported line 78)May include surrounding context.

md
脚本本身不做判断,真正的检查在同目录的 `scripts/engine/contract-consistency.js`(纯 Node 标准库,CommonJS),可以直接引用:

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
95% confidence
Finding

The file’s descriptive comments and all user-facing guidance/disclaimer strings are written in Chinese, while the skill also claims to support both Chinese and English contracts. There is no indication that users can choose their preferred output language, which creates a language/locale policy concern for users who did not opt into Chinese responses.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
94% confidence
Finding

The user-facing capability name, help text, status messages, and usage guidance are entirely in Chinese, but the file does not state that the skill is intended only for Chinese-speaking users or a China-specific workflow. Under the policy, forcing a specific language without user opt-in or documented justification is a natural-language policy violation.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
96% confidence
Finding

The JSON content is entirely in Chinese and does not indicate any user language selection, opt-in, or region-specific justification. Under the policy rule, a fixed language/locale can be a natural-language policy violation when no choice or rationale is provided.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.