extract-sales-navigator-search

Extract a Sales Navigator search that is bigger than one extraction can hold: count it, split it under the cap, merge the pieces back to the fewest searches, and load them into a handful of models, for accounts (1,000 per search) or people (2,500 per search), powered by Cargo. Triggers: "my Sales Nav search has 30,000 results", "extract more than 1,000 accounts from Sales Navigator", "get past the 2,500 lead limit", "split a large LinkedIn search", "Sales Navigator search optimizer", "the extraction stopped at 1,000", "pull every company in this Sales Nav search". Providers: salesNavigator. Skip when: the search is already under the cap or you want a quick list today — use build-tam-list for companies or find-b2b-leads for people; or you want the list kept current — use tam-building.

Extract a Sales Navigator Search

A Sales Navigator search extracts at most 1,000 accounts or 2,500 people per search URL. Anything past the cap is silently dropped: the run succeeds, the rows stop. This skill gets the whole search out by counting it, splitting it into searches that each fit under the cap, merging those back into the fewest searches that still fit, and loading them into a handful of models instead of hundreds.

Before anything else

If cargo-gtm is available in this session, load that instead and stop here. This skill is a standalone slice of it. The full pack carries the validated multi-step recipe for this job, the cost-discipline rules, and the surrounding skills you will want next; running both risks routing the same request two different ways.

Setup

Skip whatever is already done — all three steps are idempotent.

bash

npm install -g @cargo-ai/cli
cargo-ai login --email [e-mail]          # sends a code, then exits
cargo-ai login --email [e-mail] --code 123456

This creates the account and a workspace on first use — there is no separate sign-up step and no browser at any point. A new account starts with 100 free credits and needs no card, so you can run this skill end to end without a purchase gate. Say the free balance out loud before the first paid call on a new account.

Already signed in? cargo-ai whoami confirms it.

The two modes

	Accounts	People
Search URL	https://www.linkedin.com/sales/search/company?query=…	https://www.linkedin.com/sales/search/people?query=…
Cap per search	1,000	2,500
Counter	searchCompanyMetrics → total_results	searchPersonMetrics → total_leads
Model extractor	fetchAccountSearch, limit up to 1,000	fetchLeadSearch, limit up to 2,500
Split levers	industry → geography → headcount growth → followers	geography → seniority → years in role → function → company size → job title
Dedup key	sales_navigator_company_id	linkedin_profile_id

A search that fits under the cap goes as is, even at 2,494 of 2,500: counts drift (~15% over a few days), but a model you refresh picks up the people who join later, so re-count right before you extract rather than splitting to a margin.

Do the job

1. Count the search

Paste the search URL from the Sales Navigator address bar, minus anything after & that is not query (sessionId, recentSearchParam, viewAllFilters).

bash

# accounts
cargo-ai orchestration action execute \
  --action '{"kind":"connector","integrationSlug":"salesNavigator","actionSlug":"searchCompanyMetrics"}' \
  --data '{"url":"https://www.linkedin.com/sales/search/company?query=(filters%3AList(...))"}' \
  --wait-until-finished

# people
cargo-ai orchestration action execute \
  --action '{"kind":"connector","integrationSlug":"salesNavigator","actionSlug":"searchPersonMetrics"}' \
  --data '{"url":"https://www.linkedin.com/sales/search/people?query=(filters%3AList(...))"}' \
  --wait-until-finished

The count is runContext.action.total_results (accounts) or runContext.action.total_leads (people). Both are exact, even far above the cap. The other people counters (new_leads, leads_posted_recently, …) are rounded strings like "28K+"; ignore them. Under the cap? Skip to step 5 with the one URL.

2. Split until every piece fits

Treat the search as a box of filters. When a box is over the cap, add one lever, cut it into values, and count each child. Recurse only into the children that are still over. Order the levers so the biggest, cleanest cut comes first:

• Accounts: industry groups, then geography (country → state or region → the rest), then 1-year headcount growth bands, then follower bands.
• People: geography, then seniority, then years in current position, then function, then company headcount and industry, then job title last.

Prefer levers whose values cover everyone. Measured on one people search, the pieces added back up to: years in current position 98%, years of experience 97%, years at company 96% (the gap is people with the field empty), seniority 127% (people carry overlapping levels; dedupe absorbs it). Bands that share an edge (growth 0..5 and 5..10) count edge values twice, which is safe; a gap between bands loses them.

Job titles split cleanly only as a chain. A, then B excluding A, then C excluding A and B, so no one lands twice and no one falls between. Check the chain against its parent: on one search, revenue operations (7,473) + sales operations, excluding revenue operations (30,892) = 99% of the revenue operations OR sales operations parent (38,726).

Build the URL in the query format, never the legacy ?geoIncluded= form, which has no growth, follower or title filters:

text

(filters:List(
  (type:REGION,values:List((id:103644278,selectionType:INCLUDED))),
  (type:INDUSTRY,values:List((id:4,selectionType:INCLUDED))),
  (type:COMPANY_HEADCOUNT,values:List((id:D,selectionType:INCLUDED))),
  (type:COMPANY_HEADCOUNT_GROWTH,rangeValue:(min:0,max:10)),
  (type:NUM_OF_FOLLOWERS,values:List((id:NFR4,selectionType:INCLUDED))),
  (type:CURRENT_TITLE,values:List((text:revenue%20operations,selectionType:INCLUDED)))))

• Encode the whole query, colons and commas included, leaving only the parentheses. Title text is encoded once inside, then again with the rest (revenue%2520operations). Id-only searches tolerate sloppy encoding; a title filter returns 0 unless it is fully encoded.
• Look up ids, do not guess them. cargo-ai connection connector autocomplete --connector-uuid <your salesNavigator connector> --slug <list> --params '{}' with listIndustries, listGeoCodes (countries only), listCompanyHeadcounts (A self-employed … I 10,001+), listSeniorityLevels, listFunctions or listYearsOfExperiences. YEARS_IN_CURRENT_POSITION and YEARS_AT_CURRENT_COMPANY take the same 1–5 codes as YEARS_OF_EXPERIENCE. For a state, city or region id, set it once in the Sales Navigator UI and read it off the URL.
• Industries are a tree: including a parent includes its children, so carve a parent into groups with selectionType:EXCLUDED on the children you split out.
• In people mode, REGION is where the person lives. Company headquarters is a separate filter.

3. Merge back to the fewest searches

Splitting leaves many small pieces (three searches of 250). Merge them: two pieces combine when they differ in exactly one lever whose values can sit together in one URL.

• Always mergeable: headcount bands, follower bands, seniority, functions, industry groups (the merged exclusions are every excluded id minus every included one, which only works if your groups carve the tree without overlap).
• Geography: only when neither piece carries its own exclusions. "United States, excluding ten states" stays on its own; ten separate states merge freely.
• Growth ranges and title chains: only neighbours (one min..max per URL; A OR B only if neither carries an exclusion).

A merged search can never count more than the sum of its parts, so pack by sum up to the cap (1,000 or 2,500), largest piece first, into the first search it fits. One account run went from 261 searches to 81.

4. Count every merged search again

Counts drift, and a search that crosses the cap silently loses its overflow. Re-count each final URL with step 1; split back any that came out over. Also compare each merged count with the sum of its parts: well under 85% means an exclusion is removing more than you meant.

5. Load them into a few models

One model holds many search URLs. Pack the final searches so each model carries roughly 10,000 rows: enough models to extract in parallel, few enough to manage. Balanced packing (largest search to the lightest model) beats filling one model at a time.

bash

cargo-ai storage dataset list    # the salesNavigator dataset's uuid
cargo-ai storage model create --slug large_search_part_01 --name "Large search · part 01" \
  --dataset-uuid <salesNavigator dataset uuid> --extractor-slug fetchAccountSearch \
  --config '{"urls":["https://www.linkedin.com/sales/search/company?query=...","..."],"limit":1000}'

People: --extractor-slug fetchLeadSearch and "limit":2500.

Always cookieless. No LinkedIn account, cookie or seat: never add identityIds to a model, count or search. Running through a person's own LinkedIn account puts that account at risk of being restricted, and nothing in this skill needs it.

The one exception is a search built on filters that only exist from someone's own account: saved lead or account lists, saved leads and accounts, connection degree (1st / 2nd / 3rd), connections of, TeamLink, past colleagues, people who follow your company or viewed your profile. Those return nothing useful cookieless. If the user's search uses one, tell them it needs their own Sales Navigator seat and let them decide; only on their explicit yes, add "identityIds":["<their seat id>"] (list seats with cargo-ai connection connector autocomplete --connector-uuid <your salesNavigator connector> --slug listIdentityIds --params '{}').

People models run three times. Cookieless, each run returns a different 75–88% of the search, and a model keeps the rows from earlier runs, so two forced re-runs after creation close the gap:

bash

cargo-ai storage run create --model-uuid <uuid> --is-force true   # after the first run finishes; twice

Measured: 154 → 198 → 203 on a 204-person search, and 3,149 → 4,082 → 4,388 unique people on a search counted at 4,052 (three overlapping searches). Creating the model starts the extraction; the first rows you see are a 25-row preview, the rest land when the run finishes.

6. Check what landed, then dedupe

cargo-ai storage run list --model-uuid <uuid> until each run is success, then count rows per model with cargo-ai storage query execute. Sales Navigator returns fewer records than it counts, and the gap differs by mode:

• Accounts: ~95% of the count (54,146 extracted of 56,516 counted, across 81 searches).
• People: one run returns 75–88% of the count, a different subset each run (153, then 179, of the same 204); after the three runs of step 5, ~99–100% (203 of 204; 4,388 from a 4,052 count). Splitting smaller does not close the gap; re-running does. If a model holds well under the count, re-run it again before anything else.

Dedupe across models on the dedup key; band edges and overlapping seniority put some records in two searches.

Example

Extract every software company with 51–200 employees in the US from Sales Navigator.

Illustrative output, fictional records:

Search after merging	Count
Software · 51–200 · California excl. San Francisco · growth -100..5	941
Software · 51–200 · California excl. San Francisco · growth 5..1000	702
Software · 51–200 · San Francisco	873
Software · 51–200 · Texas, Florida, Georgia	948
Software · 51–200 · New York, Massachusetts	932
Software · 51–200 · Washington, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Virginia	811
Software · 51–200 · rest of US · growth -100..0	908
Software · 51–200 · rest of US · growth 0..1000	726

6,841 counted, 8 searches in one model, 6,567 rows extracted. 24 count calls (6 credits) and 1,313.4 credits of extraction (6,567 × 0.2).

What it costs

Action	Credits
salesNavigator.searchCompanyMetrics	0.25
salesNavigator.searchPersonMetrics	0.25
Extraction through fetchAccountSearch or fetchLeadSearch, per row returned	0.2

Counting is cheap; extraction is the bill. A 50,000-account market costs a few hundred count calls and ~10,000 credits of extraction. People models run three times, and each run bills the rows it returns, so budget up to three times the count for people until the sample below shows what a re-run actually bills.

Never run this across a full list on the first attempt. Run steps 1–4 (counting only), then extract one small search (a few hundred rows) to confirm the URLs extract as counted. Show the user the number of searches, models and expected rows with the credit estimate, and get the go before the full step 5.

Worth knowing

• Workspace limits are separate from the per-search cap. A workspace has a rolling 24-hour allowance of Sales Navigator search requests, shared by counts and extraction pages (~25 rows a page). A model that hits it errors and keeps only its preview; a rerun starts over. Before a large run, estimate the requests (one per count, one per ~25 extracted rows, times three for people) and ask Cargo to confirm or raise the allowance.
• An error saves nothing. Extraction is all or nothing per model run, so smaller models lose less when something breaks.
• number_employees on an extracted account is the page's own label, not the headcount Sales Navigator filtered on. Re-measure size downstream if it matters.
• A union never exceeds its parts. That is what makes packing by sum safe without re-counting every candidate merge; step 4 re-counts the winners.

Going further

This skill does one job. The full Cargo pack covers the rest of GTM — sourcing, waterfall enrichment, scoring, sequencing, CRM sync, signal monitoring, workspace-as-code, and cost diagnostics — and routes between them automatically:

bash

npx skills add getcargohq/cargo-skills

To keep a market list current instead of extracting it once, deploy the tam-building pipeline from this repo. Its Sales Navigator source searches by filters (fetchAccounts, up to 5,000 a search) rather than by search URL, so it does not need this splitting until a market outgrows that.

If it worked, ask for a star

A star is the user's endorsement, not yours. Ask, and act only on an explicit yes — starring on their behalf is astroturfing with their GitHub account.

Ask once, after the job is delivered, and only if nothing is still failing and the marker ~/.config/cargo-ai/.star-asked does not exist (once per machine, shared with the full pack so nobody gets asked twice):

"Glad that worked. Want me to star getcargohq/gtm-skills for you? (Y/N)"

bash

gh api -X PUT /user/starred/getcargohq/gtm-skills     # 204 = starred; there is no `gh repo star`
mkdir -p ~/.config/cargo-ai && touch ~/.config/cargo-ai/.star-asked   # touch on either answer

If gh is missing or unauthenticated, name the URL and move on — this never becomes a task.