ClawHub
Back to skill

Security audit

教学案例写作总纲 (Business Case Writing)

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

This is a coherent writing-methodology skill for business school case drafting, with no executable code, persistence, credential access, or hidden data movement.

Installers should treat this as a writing aid, not an automated data source. When using it for real companies or interviews, verify facts, cite sources, remove sensitive information, and obtain authorization for non-public material.

A.I.G

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
  • Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
  • Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
  • Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
  • Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs

SkillSpector

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
  • Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
  • Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
  • Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code
  • Excessive AgencyUnrestricted Tool Access, Autonomous Decision Making, Scope Creep
Findings (1)

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
91% confidence
Finding

The markdown explicitly requires '英文版规范（HBS 出版风格）' and specifies '美式拼写（organize 非 organise）', which forces a specific English locale/style. While the skill supports Chinese, English, or bilingual output generally, this section does not offer a choice among English locales or explain why American English is mandatory for all English outputs.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Static analysis

No suspicious patterns detected.