Back to skill

Security audit

results-structure-diagnoser

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

This is a documentation-only writing-analysis skill with coherent scope and no hidden execution, credential use, persistence, or data exfiltration behavior.

Before installing, users should be comfortable with a skill whose bundled instructions and default report template are largely Chinese, although it says feedback should follow the user's input language. From a security perspective, it is a low-risk Markdown-only skill for manuscript-structure review.

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
  • Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
  • Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
  • Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
  • Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs
Vulnerability Patterns
  • Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
  • Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
  • Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
  • Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code
  • Excessive AgencyUnrestricted Tool Access, Autonomous Decision Making, Scope Creep
Findings (9)

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
94% confidence
Finding

The skill instructions are written in Chinese and describe operation on English psychology Results sections, but they do not clearly offer a user language choice at the outset. This can violate language/locale policy because it implicitly constrains interaction language unless the user already knows to provide input in a different language.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
96% confidence
Finding

This markdown template is written entirely in Chinese and labels the report format accordingly, which implies the skill's output is expected in a specific language. Under the policy, forcing a language or locale without user opt-in is a natural-language policy violation unless the restriction is explicitly justified or optional.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
95% confidence
Finding

This markdown file presents its operational instructions entirely in Chinese, which effectively forces a specific language/locale on users. The policy allows locale constraints only when the skill offers a choice or clearly documents a justified region-specific limitation, neither of which appears here.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Ae4

Medium
Category
analysis-evasion
Confidence
80% confidence
Finding

Suspicious Unicode normalization or mixed-script content

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
92% confidence
Finding

This markdown file contains natural-language instructions exclusively in Chinese, which may force a specific language on users without opt-in. Under the language/locale policy rule, this is a policy concern unless the skill explicitly offers a language choice or justifies the locale restriction.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Ae4

Medium
Category
analysis-evasion
Confidence
80% confidence
Finding

Suspicious Unicode normalization or mixed-script content

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
90% confidence
Finding

This markdown file contains substantial Chinese text in the title and throughout the rubric, which effectively imposes a specific language on users. The policy allows locale constraints only when they are explicitly justified or when users are given a choice, neither of which is stated here.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
87% confidence
Finding

This markdown file is written as a skill/reference document and its heading explicitly presents the material in Chinese. Under the language/locale policy rule, forcing a specific language without opt-in can be a natural-language policy issue when no alternative language option or justification is provided.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
92% confidence
Finding

This markdown file presents all operational guidance in Chinese, including the title and instructions, with no indication that another language is supported or that Chinese is required for a justified region-specific purpose. That can violate a language/locale policy when users are not given an explicit opt-in or alternative.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Static analysis

No suspicious patterns detected.