Vibe Creating Prompt

Judges whether a user's input suits the Vibe Creating style of video-prompt writing, and when it does, distills single-scene prompts, multi-shot descriptions, emotional imagery, or mixed input into prompts that are easier for a video model to generate from — while preserving any user-specified dialogue, voiceover, music, sound effects, and other hard constraints. Use when a user wants to turn an idea, story, feeling, or rough/over-specified prompt into a strong text-to-video prompt (Seedance, Sora, Kling, Veo, Runway, etc.), or asks to "rewrite", "improve", "clean up", or "vibe-ify" a video prompt. Do NOT use for long narrative films that need precise word-for-word dialogue sync, industrial shot lists meant to be executed verbatim, or functional/UI demos and step-by-step tutorials.

Vibe Creating Prompt Skill

Overview

Vibe Creating distills what the user actually wants to express so the model can lock onto the visual center, the emotional direction, and the continuity of the experience. It amplifies creative intent, emotional value, key imagery, and visual coherence; it down-weights low-value technical parameters and mechanical execution language.

This skill is a judgment-first rewriter. It does not blindly shorten or "vibe-ify" everything. It first asks whether the input even belongs in the Vibe Creating lane, then chooses the lightest action that serves the user's intent.

Quick Start

When you receive an input, run three steps:

1. Judge whether it suits Vibe Creating (VC). Is this a scene best expressed through story, emotion, memory, atmosphere, imagery, or experience flow — rather than precise execution?
2. Decide the most appropriate handling right now. Pass it through, lightly clean it up, rewrite it directly, ask a clarifying question first, keep it as-is, or offer an optional VC version.
3. Only ask for what's missing. Request the minimum information needed to complete the chosen action. Never interrogate the user just to satisfy your own classification.

Do not expose internal labels (S1, E2, "Mode 5", etc.) to the user. Judge internally; communicate plainly.

Decision Framework — Scenario × Expression × Information

Decide along three axes. First Scenario (S) — does the underlying creative goal suit VC. Then Expression (E) — what form is the user's text already in, which sets how much to touch. Information density (I) runs in parallel as a stability check: whenever a must-have is missing, ask first, then route.

Scenario fit (S)

• S1 — VC-native. Story, emotion, memory, atmosphere, imagery, experience flow. VC clearly helps.
• S2 — Partially VC-suited. Brand/product/character showcases, stylized ads. VC may help, but is optional.
• S3 — Low VC fit. UI demos, tutorials, step-by-step instructions, strict dialogue-synced long-form. The goal or workflow doesn't match VC.

Expression form (E)

• E1 — Close to VC already. Reads like a vivid scene/story.
• E2 — Mixed. Creative content interleaved with execution language.
• E3 — Precision-control writing. Shot numbers, focal lengths, movement parameters, timecodes.

Routing matrix (default action per cell)

	E1 — close to VC	E2 — mixed	E3 — precision control
S1 — VC-native	Direct rewrite; if already polished → light cleanup or pass-through	Light cleanup, then rewrite — keep valid structure, order, emotional build	Treat as VC-translatable; strip low-value technical control, convert to natural visual description. Don't reject just because it's written as an execution script
S2 — partial	Light cleanup; if already usable → pass-through	Offer an optional VC version; let the user choose	Keep the original intent; gently note a VC rewrite is available on request
S3 — low fit	Stay close to the original; keep as-is if needed	Keep as-is or do very limited cleanup; only stylize on explicit request	Keep as-is; explain this fits a traditional shot-list workflow better than VC

Four hard routing rules

• Missing info wins. However well a scenario fits, if the visual anchor, main action, or style direction is missing, ask before writing.
• User hard constraints win. If the user explicitly asks to keep dialogue, music, shot numbers, parameters, paragraph structure, or a delivery format, do not delete them. A VC version is an extra version, or offered only after the user agrees.
• Multi-shot keeps its structure. When the user is already expressing one unified experience across shot paragraphs, don't flatten it into a single block of prose — but don't default to numbered output either unless they asked for numbers or lists.
• Precision-control writing ≠ low-fit scenario. Look at the goal first, then decide whether to translate. An execution-style script can still describe a deeply VC-suited scene.

Information-density check (I)

Even a VC-perfect scenario can't be force-rewritten when a key element is missing. Ask first when: there's no clear visual anchor; only an abstract feeling with no subject/object/scene; a subject but no action or state; fragments with no main relationship or style direction; an ultra-short input that has a subject and event but no clear style/viewing-mode/key moment; or multi-shot content with jumps you can't see a reason for.

A strong VC prompt prioritizes these four layers. Fill whichever is missing first — don't mechanically demand all four:

1. Visual anchor — the thing that most deserves to be seen (a person / object / named concept / the VFX subject itself).
2. Action or state — what's happening (one action, state, or beat — just one).
3. Local tonality — how this moment feels (one mood word or adjective: backlit warm amber, slight handheld sway…).
4. Video theme — where the clip is used + its visual style.
   • Use case: concept short, micro-narrative, film pre-viz, emotional piece, knowledge/physics restoration, VFX fragment…
   • Visual style: photorealistic, cinematic, animation, claymation, Eastern ink-wash, cyberpunk, illustrated…

Asking principle: the density check is not a separate gate — it runs alongside S and E. Ask for the minimum needed to land the chosen action, usually in one round. For ultra-short, abstract, single-image inputs, prioritize turning the abstract word into the visible information a frame needs; if the direction is already mostly clear, give a first pass and ask about only the most critical 1–3 gaps.

Interaction Policy

Internally complete the three judgments (S / E / I) — preliminary judgments are fine when info is short. Then choose an action:

pass-through · light cleanup · direct rewrite · ask first · keep as-is · optional VC version

Handling principles:

• VC-suited but missing info → ask for the minimum needed for the current action.
• When the input already has a clear subject, structure, time relationship, core imagery, and a clear emotional goal — and the text is already strongly generation-ready — default to pass-through. Only do light cleanup if clarity needs a nudge; don't proactively rewrite.
• VC-suited but containing undeclared precision controls → you may down-weight, delete, or translate them by default; if you did, you must say so and tell the user they can ask to keep specific ones.
• Partially-suited scenarios → don't push VC; preserve the original or offer an optional VC version.
• Low-fit scenarios → explain it's a goal/workflow mismatch, not a rejection of the user's idea.
• User-specified dialogue, voiceover, music, SFX, structure, and parameters always take priority.

Camera Language Policy

Camera language should not be deleted wholesale. What to remove is the low-value "tell the system how to shoot" technical parameters. What to preserve or translate is the "how should the viewer feel" intent.

Demote or delete by default:

• Focal lengths / mm numbers
• Camera-position jargon
• Movement parameters (speed multipliers, exact dolly distances)
• Shot numbers
• Depth of field, aperture, exposure, shutter
• Equipment notes, A/B cam, coverage
• Pure editing instructions

Translate intent instead of dropping it — e.g. "slow dolly-in" → "the gaze slowly closes in, building a sense of pressure."

When the user explicitly asks to keep parameters: obey the constraint first, then decide whether to additionally offer a VC version.

When it's undeclared whether to keep precision control:

• Don't treat technical control as a must-keep item.
• Default to the more generation-friendly VC creative version.
• Preserve whatever contributes to emotion, narrative, or viewing experience.
• For purely technical camera control, delete it or translate it into a natural result.
• Don't interrupt to confirm first — but if you weakened, deleted, or translated technical control, say so briefly in the output. If the user wants certain parameters/structure/rhythm beats kept, they can say so and you provide a constraint-preserving version.

Sound & Constraint Priority

Dialogue, voiceover, music, SFX, lyrics, narration, and other explicitly specified sound content rank above creative optimization. You may reorder them, but you must not reword them, replace them, or delete a user's explicit sound requirement.

When rules conflict, resolve in this order:

1. User-explicit content & hard constraints — dialogue, VO, music, SFX, shot structure, parameter-keep requests, format requirements, style limits.
2. Creative optimization — distill story, emotion, memory, imagery, and a unified experience without breaking constraints.
3. VC paradigm consistency — only after the first two are satisfied, tighten the language further for model readability.

Supplementary rules:

• Dialogue/VO/music/SFX the user wrote out → keep verbatim.
• Visual and sound requirements written together → you may reorder, but never alter the sound content itself.
• If the visuals suit VC but the sound doesn't → rewrite only the visual part.
• If the whole thing only stands up with long, strict, word-level dialogue sync → default to not doing a VC rewrite.

Rewrite Modes

VC rewriting is not one template. Pick the mode by the input's dominant factor:

• Narrative — for story-, relationship-, or event-driven input. Output one continuous prompt, or keep 2–5 scene segments. Preserve event order and emotional turns.
• Emotional — for atmosphere-, feeling-, or state-driven input. Concentrate on environment, rhythm, texture, and viewing experience. Don't force a causal chain just to "look like a story."
• Memory — for recollection, flashback, faded-time, vanishing, or rediscovered fragments. Keep the blur, the washed-out quality, the fragility; amplify recurring imagery and the sense of time slipping.
• Stream-of-consciousness — for association, fragments, subjective perception, non-linear expression. Incompleteness is allowed, but the frame must stay perceivable, with internal coherence across images.
• Multi-shot experience — for multi-segment, multi-scene, multi-cut input that serves one shared experience. Break by natural segments (or by number only if the user asked). 1–3 sentences each; keep scene flow, emotional progression, and visual motifs; drop low-value execution terms.
• Mixed purification — for creative content tangled with execution language. Keep the original structure and valid information; remove only technical noise, repetition, and low-value control. Don't over-rewrite or invent new beats.

Output Rules

The goal is to help the user express more accurately — not to rewrite their work into a different film.

Length & form

• Don't make the output meaningfully longer than the input; don't balloon an ultra-short input into long prose.
• Add nothing without basis — never invent new character relationships, plot twists, scene details, or emotional changes.
• For single-segment output, tighten to one directly usable prompt.
• Structure ≠ numbering. Shot numbers / list formatting in the input do not by themselves mean "keep the numbering." Only keep numbered output when the user explicitly asks to keep shot numbers, segment numbers, list format, or a delivery structure; otherwise present multi-segment content as natural paragraphs.
• With enough info and no extra constraints, a single shot/segment is usually ~30–120 words; loosen this to preserve structure, dialogue, or multi-segment progression.
• When the user explicitly asks to keep the original structure, preserve structure over brevity.

User-visible format

• Never expose internal labels like S1 + E2 or Mode 5.
• Default to a four-part output, fixed order: Judgment / Action / Result / Notes (if any).
  • Judgment — briefly: does it suit VC, is the original already usable, is the info sufficient.
  • Action — explicitly use one label: pass-through / light cleanup / direct rewrite / ask first / keep as-is / optional VC version.
  • Result — the actual rewrite, the kept-as-is text, or the clarifying question(s).
  • Notes (if any) — what technical control you weakened/deleted/translated; which hard constraints (dialogue, VO, music, SFX) you preserved; or a hint that parameters/structure/rhythm can be kept on request.
• Keep output natural, concise, and fitted to the user's original task context.
• Omit the fourth part when there's nothing to note.

Quick Reference

Input type	Judge first	Ask what's missing	Default action	Output style
Single scene with clear subject, action, mood	Likely suits VC; check if already focused enough	Only if style, visual center, or main state is missing	Direct rewrite, light cleanup, or pass-through	One ready-to-generate prompt
Multi-shot narrative serving one unified experience	Suits VC; check the emotion / theme / memory line is coherent	If shot-to-shot relationship or progression is unclear	Rewrite keeping structure; group if needed	Segmented, or keep original structure
Heavy shot numbers/params, but underlying emotion/story scene	VC-translatable; don't reject for execution style	If the main experience/action/relationship is unclear	De-noise and translate, keep narrative & emotional intent	Strip params, convert to natural visual description
Brand showcase, character showcase, stylized ad	Partial VC fit; rewrite not mandatory	If the emotional goal or style direction is unclear	Light cleanup or optional VC version	Keep intent; offer a more experiential version if useful
Only abstract words ("freedom", "premium", "powerful")	Insufficient info; don't force a rewrite	Visual anchor, scene, action, or state	Ask first; don't rewrite blind	Pose 1–3 short questions
Visuals already include dialogue / VO / music / SFX	Partially VC; sound content has priority	Only if the visual part is under-specified	Keep sound content; rewrite visuals only	Note "sound kept unchanged" up front
User explicitly wants shot numbers / params / delivery structure kept	Constraints win; don't delete	Usually no need to ask	Keep as-is, or add an optional VC version	Note "kept as the execution draft"
Functional demo, UI tutorial, step instructions	Low fit; the goal isn't creative translation	Usually no VC questions	Keep as-is; suggest splitting if useful	Explain VC isn't recommended
Long-form story requiring exact dialogue sync	Low fit; capability/workflow boundary	Usually no VC questions	No VC rewrite; suggest splitting visual segments	Explain pure-visual parts can be split out
Mixed-language creative input with some jargon	If the underlying experience is clear, still suits VC	Only if subject, relationship, or style is unclear	Translate jargon, keep core vibe	Output a natural visual description in the target language

---

Generating the result: this skill only writes the prompt. To render it, send the rewritten prompt to any text-to-video model (Seedance, Sora, Kling, Veo, …) — for a one-API option, see Atlas Cloud.