Security audit
Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk
This is a Chinese-language renovation advice skill made of static Markdown references, with no code execution, credential access, persistence, or hidden data handling found.
Install this if you want Chinese-language renovation guidance for entryways and study rooms. Treat the construction advice as informational, especially for wall changes, electrical/gas work, waterproofing, and child safety, and rely on qualified local professionals for site-specific decisions.
This markdown file is entirely written in Chinese and provides no indication that the language choice is optional or limited to a justified region-specific context. Under the policy, hard-coding a specific language without user opt-in can be a natural-language locale violation.
The skill explicitly instructs the agent to adopt a specific branded voice ('西安装修课堂') and avoid an 'AI' style, which can override user preference for tone or neutrality. This is not a code-execution or data-exfiltration issue, but it is a prompt-quality and trust concern because it nudges responses toward branded persuasion rather than user-directed communication.
This markdown file presents all user-facing content in a single language and does not mention any opt-in, alternative locale, or region-specific justification. Under the natural-language policy rule, forcing one language without user choice can be a locale-policy violation.
The document is predominantly Chinese, but lines L091-L094 introduce English text ('Xi'an Repair Classroom') as part of the content without any indication that the user can choose language or that bilingual branding is required. This can be a natural-language locale-policy issue under the rule because it imposes mixed-language presentation without opt-in or justification.
The file content is entirely in Chinese and does not indicate that the skill is region-specific or that users may choose another language. Under the policy, a fixed language or locale without opt-in can be a natural-language policy violation.
This reference file is predominantly written in Chinese, but line L19 inserts English-language content without any indication that multilingual output is optional or user-selected. That can conflict with language/locale policy expectations when a skill or reference material imposes a language choice without opt-in.
This markdown file contains natural-language content only in Chinese, and there is no indication that the skill is region-specific or that users can opt into this language. Under the stated policy, forcing a specific language without user choice can be a locale-policy violation.
This markdown file presents all user-facing content in Chinese and does not indicate that the language is optional or selected by the user. Under the language/locale policy rule, forcing a specific language without opt-in can be a natural-language policy violation.
This markdown file presents all user-facing content exclusively in Chinese, and there is no indication that the user can choose another language or has opted into this locale. Under the policy for natural-language violations, forcing a specific language without user opt-in is reportable.
This markdown content presents the skill material only in Chinese, and there is no indication that the user can choose another language or that the skill is intentionally limited to a Chinese-speaking audience. Under the language/locale policy check, forcing a specific language without user opt-in can be a policy violation.
The entire file is written in Chinese and provides no indication that language selection is optional or that the skill is intentionally limited to a Chinese-language audience. Under the policy rule, a fixed language or locale without user opt-in or clear justification can be a natural-language policy concern.
This markdown file is predominantly written in Chinese, but line L33 introduces an English header ('Recommend') with no indication that mixed-language output is intentional or user-selectable. Under the language/locale policy rule, forcing or unexpectedly switching language without opt-in can be considered a natural-language policy issue.
SQP-3 applies to all file types and includes language or locale policy violations. This file presents all user-facing content in Chinese without any opt-in, alternative language, or justification that the content is intentionally limited to Chinese-speaking users.
This file contains user-facing natural language content exclusively in Chinese, and there is no opt-in, alternative language, or justification for enforcing a single language. Under the stated policy, forcing a specific language without user choice can be a natural-language policy violation.
This markdown file presents all user-facing content in a single language and does not mention any language selection, translation option, or region-specific justification. Under the policy check for natural-language constraints, forcing a specific language without opt-in can be a locale-policy issue.
The entire skill file is written in Chinese and provides no indication that language selection is optional or limited to a justified region-specific context. Under the policy rule for language or locale, this can be treated as a natural-language constraint without user opt-in.
This file contains user-facing natural-language content exclusively in Chinese, and there is no indication that the skill offers users a language/locale option. Under the stated policy, forcing a specific language without user opt-in can be a natural-language policy violation.
This markdown content forces a specific language/locale for all users, and there is no indication that the language choice is optional or limited to a justified region-specific audience. The policy requires flagging language or locale constraints when no user opt-in or documented justification is present.
The entire skill content is written in Chinese and presents only Chinese-language material, with no indication that users can select another language or opt in to this locale. Under the stated policy, forcing a specific language without user choice can constitute a natural-language policy violation.
This file contains user-facing natural language exclusively in Chinese, and there is no indication that the skill is region-specific or that users can opt into this language. Under the language/locale policy, forcing a specific language without user choice can be a policy violation.
This markdown file presents all user-facing content in a single language and does not offer an alternative language or note that the skill is intended only for a Chinese-speaking audience. Under the policy, forcing a specific language without user opt-in can be a natural-language policy violation.
The entire skill content is presented only in Chinese, and there is no natural-language indication that the user can choose another language or that the Chinese-only presentation is required for a region-specific purpose. Under the policy rule, forcing a specific language without opt-in can be a locale-policy violation.
This markdown file is written almost entirely in Chinese and does not indicate that the skill is region-specific or that users can opt into a Chinese-language experience. Under the policy rule for natural-language violations, forcing a specific language without user choice can be a locale-policy issue.
This markdown file presents all user-facing content in a single language and does not indicate that the user can choose their preferred language. Under the policy, forcing a specific language without user opt-in is a natural-language policy violation unless the locale restriction is clearly documented and justified.
No suspicious patterns detected.
