Back to skill

Security audit

收纳储物不踩雷

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

This is a markdown-only Chinese home storage planning skill with no code execution, credential access, persistence, or hidden system behavior.

This skill appears safe to install from a security perspective. Users should expect Chinese-language home storage advice with a direct, sometimes harsh tone, and should treat renovation or purchasing suggestions as general guidance rather than professional design advice.

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
  • Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
  • Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
  • Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
  • Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs
Vulnerability Patterns
  • Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
  • Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
  • Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
  • Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code
  • Excessive AgencyUnrestricted Tool Access, Autonomous Decision Making, Scope Creep
Findings (2)

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
90% confidence
Finding

The skill persona and all prescribed interaction patterns are written to require Chinese-language behavior, with no indication that users may choose another language. Under the policy, forcing a specific language without user opt-in is a natural-language locale violation unless the regional constraint is explicitly justified.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
97% confidence
Finding

The document uses derogatory phrasing ('四体不勤邋遢的人', '猪窝') to characterize untidy people. While not a technical exploit, this is a genuine content-safety and quality issue because it can shame or alienate users and make the skill feel hostile, especially in a consumer home-improvement context where users are seeking advice rather than judgment.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Static analysis

No suspicious patterns detected.