Security audit
Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk
This is a Chinese-language home lighting advice skill made of static Markdown reference content, with no executable behavior or hidden access.
Install this if you want Chinese-language lighting and renovation advice based on the included reference articles. Expect opinionated home-improvement guidance, but there is no evidence that the skill runs code, accesses credentials, changes files, or persists behavior.
The entire skill file is written in Chinese and presents user-facing content exclusively in that language, with no indication that the user can choose another language or that the skill is region-specific. Per the policy, enforcing a specific language without opt-in can be a natural-language policy violation.
The line invites users to 'consult the smart housekeeper/renovation butler at any time' without clear scope or user initiation boundaries. In an agent skill context, this kind of open-ended call to action can trigger unintended consultation behavior or broad handoff patterns, especially if the system interprets it as a standing instruction rather than ordinary article text.
This file is entirely written in Chinese and provides no indication that the skill offers a language choice or that Chinese-only output is a justified regional requirement. Under the policy, forcing a specific language without user opt-in is a natural-language policy violation.
This markdown file is entirely written in Chinese and provides no indication that language choice is optional or that the skill is specifically intended for a Chinese-speaking or region-specific audience. Under the policy rule for natural-language violations, forcing a specific language without user opt-in can be a locale policy issue.
The entire skill content is written in Chinese and provides no indication that other languages are supported or that Chinese is an intentional user-selected locale. Under the policy, forcing a specific language without user opt-in is a natural-language policy violation unless the locale constraint is clearly documented and justified.
The entire file is written in Chinese and presents the skill content only in that language, with no indication that users may choose another language or that the skill is intentionally limited to a Chinese-speaking context. Under the stated policy, forcing a specific language without opt-in can be a natural-language policy violation.
The entire skill content is written exclusively in Chinese and provides no indication that another language can be used or that the user may choose their preferred locale. Under the policy, forcing a specific language without user opt-in is a natural-language policy violation unless the locale constraint is clearly documented and justified.
This markdown file presents all user-facing content in a single language, which can be a natural-language policy concern when no user opt-in or locale justification is provided. The content does not indicate that the skill is intentionally limited to Chinese-speaking users or a China-specific context.
This markdown file contains user-facing natural language only in Chinese, and there is no indication that the skill is region-specific or that users can opt into the language. Under the policy, forcing a specific language without user choice can be a locale-policy violation.
The document is entirely presented in Chinese and anchored to a specific regional context (陕西) without any indication that language or locale is optional or user-selectable. Under the policy criteria, this can be a language/locale constraint that is not documented as opt-in or justified as region-specific tooling.
The natural-language content throughout the file is presented only in Chinese, with no indication that the skill is region-specific or that users can opt into another language. Under the policy, forcing a specific language without user choice can be a locale-policy violation.
This markdown file presents all user-facing content in a single language without any opt-in, fallback, or explanation. Under the language/locale policy check, forcing one language in natural-language content can be a policy violation when no user choice is offered.
The file content is entirely in Chinese and provides no indication that language selection is optional or limited to a justified region-specific use case. Under the stated policy, forcing a specific language without user opt-in is a natural-language policy concern.
This file contains user-facing natural-language content only in Chinese and does not indicate that the skill is region-specific or that users may choose another language. Under the language/locale policy, forcing a specific language without opt-in can be a policy violation.
The file content is entirely in Chinese and provides no indication that language selection is optional or that the skill is intentionally limited to a Chinese-speaking audience. Under the policy, forcing a specific language without user opt-in can be a natural-language policy violation.
This markdown file presents all user-facing content in a single language and does not indicate that the skill is intentionally limited to Chinese-speaking users or a China-specific context. Under the stated policy, forcing a specific language without user opt-in can be a natural-language policy violation.
This file contains only Chinese-language natural-language content and provides no opt-in, alternative language, or justification for a locale-specific restriction. Under the language/locale policy criteria, forcing a specific language without user choice can be a policy issue.
The entire skill content is presented only in Chinese, with no indication that language choice is optional or that the file is intentionally limited to a Chinese-language audience. Under the stated policy, forcing a specific language without opt-in can be a natural-language policy violation.
This markdown file contains only Chinese-language instructional content and does not indicate that the user can choose another language or that the skill is intentionally region- or locale-specific. Under the stated policy, forcing a specific language without user opt-in is a natural-language policy concern.
This markdown file presents all user-facing content in a specific language without offering an alternative or documenting that the skill is intended only for Chinese-speaking users. That can violate language/locale policy when no user opt-in or justified locale restriction is provided.
The entire skill content is presented only in Chinese, with no indication that language selection is optional or that the file is intentionally limited to a Chinese-language audience. Under the policy, forcing a specific language without user opt-in can constitute a natural-language policy violation.
This markdown file contains user-facing natural language content only in Chinese and does not indicate that the skill is limited to Chinese-speaking users or provide any opt-in for language preference. Under the language/locale policy rule, forcing a single language without user choice can be a policy concern.
This markdown skill content presents all user-facing instructions in a single language and does not indicate that the user can choose another language. Under the stated policy, forcing a specific language without user opt-in is a natural-language policy concern.
The file consists entirely of Chinese-language instructional content and provides no indication that the skill is region-specific or that users can opt into this language/locale. Under the policy rules, forcing a specific language without user choice or justification is a natural-language policy concern.
This markdown content forces a specific language presentation and does not indicate that the skill or reference is intentionally limited to Chinese-speaking users. Under the language/locale policy, natural-language content should not impose a language without user opt-in or clear justification.
