Back to skill

Security audit

漫客软件法律专家

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

This skill is a disclosed Chinese-language legal compliance review assistant that reads user-provided code or documents and produces compliance findings without hidden execution, persistence, or data exfiltration behavior.

Install only if you want a Chinese-language compliance review workflow. Treat its legal outputs as preliminary screening, verify current law and jurisdiction choices with qualified counsel, and provide only code or documents you are authorized to have reviewed by an AI tool.

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
  • Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
  • Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
  • Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
  • Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs
Vulnerability Patterns
  • Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
  • Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
  • Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
  • Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code
  • Excessive AgencyUnrestricted Tool Access, Autonomous Decision Making, Scope Creep
Findings (5)

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
89% confidence
Finding

The instruction "中国法规优先" requires the skill to prioritize one jurisdiction's legal framework whenever the system mainly serves Chinese users. This imposes a locale/jurisdiction preference in the skill's behavior without presenting it as a user choice or clearly constraining the skill to a China-specific compliance context throughout the file.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
95% confidence
Finding

The entire skill file is written exclusively in Chinese and provides no indication that users may choose another language or locale. Under the policy rule for natural-language violations, forcing a specific language without opt-in is reportable unless the locale constraint is clearly documented and justified.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
92% confidence
Finding

The entire skill content is written in Chinese and does not indicate that other languages are supported, nor does it offer any user opt-in or locale selection. Under the policy, forcing a specific language without user choice or a documented region-specific justification is a natural-language policy violation.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
93% confidence
Finding

This markdown file is entirely framed as a reporting template in Chinese, beginning with a Chinese title and description, and it does not state that language selection is optional. Under the policy rule for natural-language violations, forcing a specific language without user opt-in is reportable unless the locale constraint is clearly documented and justified.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
83% confidence
Finding

The document title and all instructional content are written exclusively in Chinese, with no indication that language selection is optional or that the methodology is intended only for a Chinese-speaking or region-specific audience. Under the policy rule for natural-language violations, forcing a single language without user opt-in can be a locale-policy issue.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Static analysis

No suspicious patterns detected.