Back to skill

Security audit

socratic-dialogue

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

This is a simple Socratic-question helper that prints guidance and prompts, with no hidden access, network use, persistence, or data handling found.

Install this if you are comfortable with a mostly Chinese-language Socratic dialogue helper. It appears low risk: the included scripts only display prompts and guidance, and I found no hidden data access, remote execution, or persistence.

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
  • Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
  • Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
  • Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
  • Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs
Vulnerability Patterns
  • Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
  • Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
  • Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
  • Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code
  • Excessive AgencyUnrestricted Tool Access, Autonomous Decision Making, Scope Creep
Findings (5)

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
88% confidence
Finding

The skill title and operational description are written primarily in Chinese, and the guidance does not tell users they may interact in another language or choose their preferred locale. Because this is a natural-language behavior/policy issue that can constrain language use without opt-in, it fits the locale-policy violation category.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
82% confidence
Finding

The manifest description is written entirely in Chinese and presents the skill in a single language with no indication that users can opt into another locale. Under the policy, forcing a specific language without user choice can be a natural-language policy violation unless the locale restriction is documented and justified.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
93% confidence
Finding

The user-facing names, descriptions, and all question prompts are exclusively in Chinese, which implies the skill is intended to operate in a single language. Under the policy, forcing a specific language without user opt-in or documented justification is a natural-language policy violation.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
90% confidence
Finding

The help output and user-facing guidance are written in Chinese, and the script does not indicate that language selection is optional or configurable. This can violate a language/locale policy when users are not explicitly given a choice of language.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
95% confidence
Finding

This markdown guide is written entirely in Chinese and presents the interaction pattern in that language without indicating that users may choose another language. Under the policy for natural-language violations, forcing a specific language without user opt-in is a reportable issue unless the locale constraint is explicitly justified.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.