Ae1
High
- Category
- analysis-evasion
- Confidence
- 100% confidence
- Finding
Referenced artifact was not completely inspected
- Content
md | 文档与理论文本 | 本 `SKILL.md`、`README.md`、其中「理论依据」段与一切理论表述 | **不在 MIT 覆盖范围内**：保留所有权利（All rights reserved） |
Security audit
unified-task-ledger
Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk
Overview
This is a documentation-only task tracking skill with some broad routing and licensing ambiguity, but no hidden code, persistence, credential access, or exfiltration behavior was found.
Install only if you want a mostly Chinese task-ledger methodology skill. Be aware that its broad triggers may activate for ordinary task-related requests, and its license text is internally confusing because the package says MIT while also reserving rights over the documentation.
Vulnerability Patterns
- Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
- Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
- Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
- Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
- Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs
Vulnerability Patterns
- Trigger AbuseOverly Broad Trigger, Shadow Command Trigger, Keyword Baiting Trigger
- Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
- Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
- Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
- Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code
Findings (5)
Vague Triggers
Medium
- Category
- Not specified by scanner
- Confidence
- 95% confidence
- Finding
The trigger keywords are extremely generic terms such as "unified", "task", and "ledger", which are likely to appear in ordinary user requests unrelated to this specific skill. This can cause the skill to activate too broadly, creating routing ambiguity and increasing the chance that users are steered into this task-management workflow when they intended something else.
- Content
Vague Triggers
Medium
- Category
- Not specified by scanner
- Confidence
- 89% confidence
- Finding
The manifest description contains very broad trigger phrases such as task dispatch, task status, DSH, and WorkSwarm that could match ordinary user requests without clear activation boundaries. This increases the chance of unintended invocation of a skill that can coordinate task routing and result collection across channels, which could expose workflow metadata or trigger operational actions in contexts where the user did not explicitly intend to use this skill.
- Content
Natural-Language Policy Violations
Low
- Category
- Not specified by scanner
- Confidence
- 79% confidence
- Finding
The file begins with a policy-style scope notice written primarily in Chinese, while the actual license text is in English. Because this organizational/legal guidance is presented in a fixed language without offering an alternative or indicating user choice, it may violate a language/locale policy requiring opt-in or multilingual accessibility.
- Content
Natural-Language Policy Violations
Low
- Category
- Not specified by scanner
- Confidence
- 72% confidence
- Finding
The manifest description presents the skill in Chinese and does not mention whether users can interact in other languages or choose a locale. This can be a language-policy issue when a skill implicitly assumes a single language without documenting that constraint or offering user choice.
- Content
Static analysis
No suspicious patterns detected.