Back to skill

Security audit

7步需求拆解框架

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

This skill is a disclosed request-analysis workflow with usability concerns from broad activation and Chinese-only templates, but no evidence of code execution, persistence, data access, or exfiltration.

Install this only if you want the agent to frequently pause for structured requirement analysis. Users who prefer concise answers or non-Chinese output should adjust the skill to mirror the user's language and narrow activation to complex or ambiguous tasks.

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
  • Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
  • Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
  • Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
  • Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs
Vulnerability Patterns
  • Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
  • Trigger AbuseOverly Broad Trigger, Shadow Command Trigger, Keyword Baiting Trigger
  • Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
  • Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
  • Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code
Findings (3)

Vague Triggers

High
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
96% confidence
Finding

The activation description is extremely broad, triggering on ordinary user tasks, questions, link sharing, and vague phrases. This can cause the skill to intercept a large share of normal conversations and impose its workflow even when unnecessary, increasing the chance of prompt-routing abuse, user friction, and unintended control over agent behavior.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
89% confidence
Finding

The skill content is written to enforce a Chinese-language workflow and output format without any indication that the user's language preference should be respected. In practice this can override user expectations, reduce usability, and create confusion or unsafe misunderstandings if the surrounding interaction is in another language.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
94% confidence
Finding

The skill content is entirely written in Chinese and includes fixed Chinese response examples and stylistic directives, which can push the agent to respond in Chinese regardless of the user's preferred language. This creates a usability and safety issue because it can degrade clarity, prevent informed user confirmation, and interfere with higher-priority system or user language preferences.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.