Security audit
Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk
This is a read-only toon shader reference skill with no evidence of unsafe execution, persistence, credential use, or hidden behavior.
Install this if you want an agent to use bundled toon-shader reference material. Be aware that some detailed references are Chinese or bilingual, so users who need English-only documentation may need translation, and the workflow may cause the agent to read several included reference files before answering.
The document is written primarily in Chinese, including headings and explanatory text, with no indication that language selection is optional or that the skill is intentionally limited to a Chinese-speaking audience. This can violate language/locale policy when a skill imposes a specific language without user opt-in.
The entire skill file is written in Chinese, with only limited English headings, and does not indicate that language selection is optional. This can violate a language/locale policy when users are not given a choice or told the skill is specifically intended for a Chinese-speaking audience.
SQP-3 applies to all file types and covers language or locale policy violations. The title immediately presents bilingual content and the rest of the document is predominantly Chinese, but the file does not state that the skill or documentation is region-specific or that users may choose their preferred language.
This markdown file is almost entirely written in Chinese, including headings and explanatory text, but it does not state that the skill is region-specific or provide an opt-in for language/locale. Under the policy, forcing a specific language without user choice is a natural-language policy violation.
This markdown file is primarily written in Chinese while also embedding English shader terms, and it does not indicate that the user can choose another language or that the content is intentionally region-specific. Under the policy rule for language or locale constraints, forcing a specific language without opt-in can be a natural-language policy issue.
The file content is written primarily in Chinese, including headings and explanatory text, with no indication that users may choose another language or locale. Under the stated policy, forcing a specific language without user opt-in is a natural-language policy concern.
The markdown content is written entirely in Chinese, with only limited English labels, and does not indicate that another language is available or that Chinese is a required locale. Under the policy criteria, forcing a specific language without user opt-in is a natural-language policy concern.
This markdown file is written entirely in Chinese, including the substantive operational description, without indicating that another language is available or that Chinese is a region-specific requirement. Under the stated policy, forcing a specific language without user opt-in is a natural-language policy concern.
This markdown file presents its instructional content almost entirely in Chinese, with only limited English glosses. Under the policy rule for language or locale constraints, forcing a specific language without user opt-in can be a natural-language policy violation when no choice or justification is provided.
This markdown file is natural-language content, so language policy checks apply. The title and nearly all explanatory text are in Chinese with English only as secondary labels, and the file does not state that language selection is optional or user-configurable.
This markdown file contains instructional natural language exclusively in Chinese, including headings and explanatory content, without indicating that the user can choose another language. Under the stated policy, forcing a specific language without user opt-in is a natural-language policy concern.
The heading mixes English and Simplified Chinese, and the body is primarily written in Chinese, which can impose a language expectation on users without explicit opt-in. Under the policy rule, forcing or assuming a specific language without user choice can be a natural-language policy issue.
No suspicious patterns detected.
