Security audit
Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk
This is a China CPA exam reference skill with no executable code or hidden access, though users should treat its legal, tax, audit, and accounting content as study guidance rather than professional advice.
Install this as an exam and reference aid, not as a substitute for a licensed accountant, auditor, lawyer, or tax professional. Because tax and legal rules can change and the skill is framed around 2026 materials, verify dates, jurisdiction, assumptions, and primary sources before using answers for filings, opinions, transactions, or compliance decisions.
The entire skill is presented only in Chinese and describes a China CPA expert workflow, but it does not explicitly state that the locale/language constraint is intentional or offer users a language preference. Under the policy, forcing a specific language without opt-in can be a natural-language policy violation unless the locale restriction is clearly documented and justified.
The README says users can 'directly ask CPA-related subject questions' without special configuration, but it does not define specific trigger phrases, boundaries, or exclusion conditions. This broad natural-language activation description can overlap with ordinary conversation about CPA topics and may cause unintended invocation.
The skill offers practical accounting, legal, tax, audit, and compliance-oriented guidance that users may rely on in real-world regulated contexts, but the warning language is weak and does not clearly state that outputs are informational only and not a substitute for licensed professional advice. In these domains, incomplete or outdated guidance can cause filing errors, compliance breaches, financial misstatements, or legal exposure, especially because the skill explicitly advertises decision support and practical application.
The manifest description is entirely framed as a China CPA exam expert in Chinese, with no indication that users may choose another language or locale. This creates a natural-language locale policy concern because the skill appears to impose a specific language/context without documenting opt-in or offering alternatives.
The natural-language content and usage instructions are fully Chinese, and the skill does not indicate that users may choose another language or that Chinese-only operation is an explicit opt-in. Under the language/locale policy, forcing a specific language without user choice can be a policy concern unless the locale constraint is clearly documented and justified.
