T08 · Insecure Dependencies
- Location
SKILL.md:6- Finding
Unpinned Third-Party Homebrew Dependency
- Content
View full analysis
Vulnerability Details
File Location:
SKILL.md, line 6
Vulnerability Type: T08: Insecure Dependencies
Risk Level: MediumComplete Code Snippet:
yaml metadata: {"clawdbot":{"emoji":"🧾","requires":{"bins":["summarize"]},"install":[{"id":"brew","kind":"brew","formula":"steipete/tap/summarize","bins":["summarize"],"label":"Install summarize (brew)"}]}}Technical Analysis
The installation metadata directs the environment to obtain the
summarizeexecutable from the third-party Homebrew tapsteipete/tap. It does not pin the dependency to a reviewed version or commit and provides no artifact checksum or other integrity-verification mechanism.Consequently, the executable installed in the future may differ from the component represented by the audited skill metadata. A compromise of the tap, its maintainer account, the formula's upstream distribution location, or its release infrastructure could cause installation of an attacker-controlled formula or binary.
This finding concerns the dependency acquisition mechanism. The audited files contain no evidence that the current tap or package is malicious.
Attack Path
- An attacker compromises the third-party tap, a maintainer account, or the referenced package's upstream release infrastructure.
- The attacker modifies the Homebrew formula or replaces its downloadable artifact with a malicious version.
- A user or agent follows the skill's installation metadata and installs
steipete/tap/summarize. - Homebrew retrieves and installs the modified dependency because the skill does not constrain it to a separately verified commit, version, and checksum.
- The installed
summarizeexecutable runs under the user's account when the skill processes a URL or local file. - The malicious executable can act with the invoking user's effective permissions.
Impact Assessment
Successful exploitation could permit arbitrary code execution with t ...[truncated 488 chars]
- Remediation
View remediation
Remediation Suggestions
- Pin the dependency to a specific audited release and, where supported, an immutable source commit.
- Verify downloaded artifacts using a cryptographic checksum obtained through a trusted channel.
- Prefer a first-party or otherwise vetted package source and document the canonical source repository.
- Review the Homebrew formula and its complete transitive dependency chain before approving updates.
- Use automated dependency monitoring, but require security review before changing the pinned version or checksum.
- Run the tool with least privilege and provide only the API keys and filesystem access required for the current operation.
- Avoid exposing unrelated secrets through the process environment when invoking the executable.
