Back to skill

Security audit

财富认知操作系统Skills Pack

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

The skill is mostly a Chinese business advice playbook, but it ships a local Claude settings file that pre-approves broad reads of Windows drives and user files.

Review or remove artifact/.claude/settings.local.json before installing. The markdown playbooks themselves are mainly advisory, but the included permission file would let a compatible Claude environment read broad areas of a Windows machine and search for note vaults without fresh approval. Also treat the legal, tax, investment, and China-specific guidance as general frameworks, not professional advice.

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs
  • Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
  • Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
  • Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
  • Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
Findings (1)

T05 · Unauthorized Access and Privilege Escalation

Warning
Location
.claude/settings.local.json:4
Finding

Overly Broad Host Filesystem Permissions

Content
View full analysis

Vulnerability Details

File Location: .claude/settings.local.json, lines 4-10
Vulnerability Type: Excessive filesystem read and enumeration permissions
Risk Level: Medium

Vulnerable Configuration

json
"Read(//e//**)",
"Read(//c/Users/Administrator/**)",
"Read(//c/Users/Administrator/Documents/**)",
"Bash(find /e -maxdepth 3 -type d -iname \"biji\")",
"Bash(find /e -maxdepth 3 -type d -iname \"笔记\")",
"Bash(find /c -maxdepth 5 -type d -name \".obsidian\")",
"Bash(find /e -maxdepth 5 -type d -name \".obsidian\")",
"Bash(find /d -maxdepth 5 -type d -name \".obsidian\")",

Technical Analysis

The local Claude configuration pre-authorizes reading the entire E: drive and the complete Windows Administrator profile. It also permits filesystem reconnaissance across the C:, D:, and E: drives to locate note and Obsidian directories.

These privileges exceed the requirements of the declared Skill functionality. The Skill consists of packaged Markdown playbooks for business and wealth analysis and ordinarily needs access only to its own project files. Optional integration with a note vault does not justify unrestricted access to drive roots or the entire Administrator profile.

The configuration does not itself transmit or modify files, and the audit found no current instructions that collect or exfiltrate sensitive data. Nevertheless, these pre-approved permissions weaken the security boundary. If malicious or prompt-injected content is later processed in the same trusted project context, it may use the authorized reconnaissance commands and read permissions without triggering a new approval prompt.

Attack Path

  1. A user opens or trusts the project with .claude/settings.local.json active.
  2. The broad read and find operations become pre-approved for the agent.
  3. The agent later processes malicious or prompt-injected content in the same context.
  4. The injected instructions invoke the permitted find commands to discover ...[truncated 1006 chars]
Remediation
View remediation

Remediation Suggestions

  1. Remove .claude/settings.local.json from the distributed Skill package. Machine-specific permissions should not be shipped as part of a reusable Skill.
  2. Restrict read access to project-relative files required by the Skill rather than entire drives or user profiles.
  3. If Obsidian integration is required, ask the user to select a specific vault and grant access only to that exact directory.
  4. Remove the pre-approved cross-drive find commands. Require interactive authorization before performing filesystem discovery outside the project.
  5. Replace broad rules such as Read(//e//**) and Read(//c/Users/Administrator/**) with narrowly scoped, explicit paths.
  6. Keep sensitive directories—including credential stores, browser profiles, SSH material, and application configuration—outside every approved wildcard.
  7. Document each retained permission, its purpose, and its expected scope, and periodically review the configuration according to least-privilege principles.
Vulnerability Patterns
  • Excessive AgencyUnrestricted Tool Access, Autonomous Decision Making, Scope Creep
  • Trigger AbuseOverly Broad Trigger, Shadow Command Trigger, Keyword Baiting Trigger
  • Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
  • Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
  • Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
Findings (11)

Vague Triggers

High
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
96% confidence
Finding

The skill description declares very broad automatic activation for common topics like money, business, marketing, investment, management, personal branding, networking, and time management. Because these are high-frequency user intents, the skill may trigger in many unrelated conversations, causing unnecessary context injection and increasing the chance that its specialized instructions override or bias the base assistant’s response.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
89% confidence
Finding

The entire skill description and structure are presented only in Chinese, including usage guidance and file naming, with no indication that users may interact in other languages or opt into this locale. Under the policy, forcing a specific language without user opt-in is a natural-language policy concern unless the locale restriction is clearly documented and justified.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Vague Triggers

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
91% confidence
Finding

The routing rules use ambiguous trigger phrases such as '能做吗', '我自己', and '看不懂' without precise boundaries or exclusions. This can lead to misrouting, over-triggering multiple submodules, and inappropriate loading of business, legal, or persuasion-oriented guidance in contexts where it was not intended.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
94% confidence
Finding

Forcing Chinese output by default without regard to user language preference can create accessibility and usability issues, especially in multilingual environments. While not a direct code-execution risk, it can impair informed consent, cause misunderstandings in legal or financial guidance, and reduce the safety of downstream interactions.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Context-Inappropriate Capability

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
86% confidence
Finding

The title and opening framing of '权谋驭人教练' normalize manipulative interpersonal control under the language of strategy and uncertainty management. That framing increases the likelihood that later advice will be interpreted as permission to influence or manage people covertly rather than through ethical leadership, making misuse more likely in workplace, commercial, or interpersonal settings.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Context-Inappropriate Capability

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
90% confidence
Finding

This section explicitly teaches users to map decision-makers, information channels, alliance structures, 'key minorities,' and organizational 'minefields.' Even if framed as leadership or strategy, it provides actionable social-engineering style guidance for influencing internal power dynamics in ways that exceed ordinary business advice and can be misused for manipulation, bypassing fair process, or targeting vulnerable relationships inside organizations.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
98% confidence
Finding

The entire skill is written only in Chinese and does not offer any language selection, opt-in, or note that it is intended for a Chinese-speaking audience. Under the policy for natural-language violations, forcing a specific language without user opt-in is reportable.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
86% confidence
Finding

The section explicitly frames the guidance as specific to '中国平台特有的演化特征', and the overall file is written entirely in Chinese with no indication that users may choose another language or locale. Under the policy rule, a skill that imposes a specific language/locale without opt-in can be a natural-language policy violation.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
88% confidence
Finding

该文件是通用性的法律合规指导,但在自然语言中直接将合规判断绑定到“中国劳动法”,构成特定法域默认适用。结合文中对中国裁判文书网、中国监管要求等多处引用,文档没有提示其仅适用于中国语境,也没有给出地区选择或适用范围说明,可能违反语言/locale/法域需经用户选择或明确限定的要求。

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
96% confidence
Finding

This markdown file contains user-facing guidance exclusively in Chinese, and there is no indication that the user can opt into another language or that the skill is intentionally restricted to a Chinese-speaking or region-specific context. Under the language/locale policy, forcing a specific language without user opt-in is a natural-language policy concern.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
92% confidence
Finding

The entire skill is written exclusively in Chinese and does not indicate that users may choose another language or locale. Under the stated policy, forcing a specific language without user opt-in is a natural-language policy concern unless the locale constraint is explicitly documented and justified.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.