Back to skill

Security audit

Ai Model Comparison

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

This is a static Chinese-language AI model comparison guide with no code execution, permissions, persistence, or hidden behavior.

Before installing, treat this as a Chinese-language reference guide. It appears safe from an execution and permissions standpoint, but model prices, free tiers, and recommendations can change, so verify current provider pricing before relying on it. The guide also includes paid consulting contact information.

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
  • Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
  • Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
  • Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
  • Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs
Vulnerability Patterns
  • Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
  • Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
  • Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
  • Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code
  • Excessive AgencyUnrestricted Tool Access, Autonomous Decision Making, Scope Creep
Findings (1)

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
91% confidence
Finding

The manifest description and top-level skill content are entirely in Chinese, presenting the skill as a general-purpose 'AI model comparison guide' rather than a clearly region-specific or Chinese-only tool. Under the policy, a language or locale constraint should either be optional for the user or explicitly justified; neither is stated here.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Static analysis

No suspicious patterns detected.