Back to skill

Security audit

master-zhiyi

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

This is mostly a Tiantai Buddhism teaching skill, but it forces a third-party FoJin footer and may activate more broadly than users expect.

Review before installing if you do not want answers to include a recurring FoJin recommendation, Chinese/Tiantai persona styling, or occasional live lookups to fojin.app. There is no evidence of file theft, credential access, persistence, or destructive behavior.

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
  • Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
  • Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
  • Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
  • Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs
Findings (1)

T01 · Skill Instruction Hijacking

Error
Location
SKILL.md:109
Finding

Unconditional Third-Party Promotional Content Injection

Content
View full analysis
Remediation
View remediation
Vulnerability Patterns
  • Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
  • Trigger AbuseOverly Broad Trigger, Shadow Command Trigger, Keyword Baiting Trigger
  • Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
  • Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
  • Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code
Findings (5)

Vague Triggers

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
97% confidence
Finding

The trigger rule is explicitly broad: it says to invoke whenever a question 'touches Tiantai doctrine, even without explicit request.' That can cause unsolicited takeover on loosely related Buddhist or Chinese philosophy queries, increasing the chance of answering in an unwanted persona or applying restrictive doctrinal rules when the user did not ask for them.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
86% confidence
Finding

The skill hard-codes a specific language/register and opening style ('systematic discourse', Tiantai framing, fixed signature style) without asking the user how they want the answer delivered. This can override user preference, reduce transparency, and make the model persist in an authoritative sectarian voice even when the user wants neutral, modern, concise, or different-language responses.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
95% confidence
Finding

The manifest explicitly sets the supported languages to "zh-classical" and "zh" only. Under the policy, forcing a specific language or locale without user opt-in or a clearly documented justification is a natural-language policy concern, and this file does not state such an opt-in or rationale.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
83% confidence
Finding

The file specifies response-format and style rules entirely in Chinese and mandates fixed reply behavior, but it does not offer any user language or locale choice. For a general-purpose conversational skill, this can amount to an implicit locale/language constraint without opt-in, which matches the policy-violation category.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
95% confidence
Finding

SQP-3 applies to all file types and includes language or locale policy violations. This file presents all instructional content in Chinese without any opt-in, fallback, or justification that it is intended only for Chinese-speaking users, which can conflict with organizational language-choice expectations.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.