Back to skill

Security audit

taskleef

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

This Taskleef skill is coherent, but it needs Review because it installs an unpinned external CLI that will use the user's API key and it documents destructive task commands without confirmation guidance.

Install only if you trust the upstream Taskleef CLI source and are comfortable giving it your Taskleef API key. Prefer a pinned release or verified checksum before execution, avoid running setup as root, and require explicit confirmation with exact IDs before delete, project delete, or board clear actions.

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
  • Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
  • Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
  • Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
  • Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs
Findings (1)

T03 · Remote Payload Retrieval and Execution

Error
Location
SKILL.md:4
Finding

Mutable Remote Executable Is Downloaded and Trusted Without Integrity Verification

Content
View full analysis
Remediation
View remediation
Vulnerability Patterns
  • Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
  • Rogue AgentSelf-Modification, Session Persistence
  • Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
  • Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
  • Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code
Findings (7)

Sudo/Root Execution

Medium
Category
Privilege Escalation
Confidence
70% confidence
Finding

Commands invoke sudo or root privileges. Verify this elevated access is necessary and justified.

Content

Scanner excerpt · README.md (reported line 30)May include surrounding context.

md
brew install jq

# Ubuntu/Debian
sudo apt-get install jq

# CentOS/RHEL
sudo yum install jq

Sudo/Root Execution

Medium
Category
Privilege Escalation
Confidence
70% confidence
Finding

Commands invoke sudo or root privileges. Verify this elevated access is necessary and justified.

Content

Scanner excerpt · README.md (reported line 33)May include surrounding context.

md
brew install jq

# Ubuntu/Debian
sudo apt-get install jq

# CentOS/RHEL
sudo yum install jq

Session Persistence

Medium
Category
Rogue Agent
Confidence
90% confidence
Finding

Skill establishes unauthorized persistence across sessions via cron jobs, startup scripts, or state files. Session persistence allows an attacker to maintain access beyond the current interaction.

Content

Scanner excerpt · README.md (reported line 47)May include surrounding context.

cd taskleef/taskleef-cli chmod +x todo

Add to PATH (add to ~/.bashrc or ~/.zshrc)

export PATH="$PATH:/path/to/taskleef/taskleef-cli"

text

Missing User Warnings

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
93% confidence
Finding

The README explicitly advertises destructive capabilities like completing and deleting todos but does not warn users that the skill can modify or permanently remove Taskleef data. In an agentic context, missing disclosure increases the risk of users invoking the skill without understanding it performs write operations, which can lead to unintended data loss or workflow disruption.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Missing User Warnings

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
91% confidence
Finding

The skill documents direct deletion commands for todos without any warning, confirmation guidance, or safer alternatives. In an agent setting, users may issue ambiguous requests and the agent could choose a destructive action that permanently removes task data, increasing the risk of unintended data loss.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Missing User Warnings

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
93% confidence
Finding

Project deletion is a higher-risk destructive operation because it may remove organizational structures and potentially associated task relationships. Without a warning about data loss or a recommendation to confirm intent, an agent could delete the wrong project based on partial title/ID matching, causing broader accidental disruption.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Missing User Warnings

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
89% confidence
Finding

Clearing a board column is a bulk destructive action that can affect multiple cards at once, making mistakes more damaging than single-item commands. Combined with flexible identifier matching, this increases the chance that an agent or user clears the wrong column and causes significant unintended task loss or workflow disruption.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Static analysis

No suspicious patterns detected.