Security audit

心理学实验规划（研究设计、样本量预估）

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

This is a Chinese-language psychology experiment planning guide with no executable code, persistence, credential use, or hidden agent-control behavior.

Install this if you want Chinese-language help planning psychology studies before collecting data. Be aware that its activation phrases are broad, and verify any statistical, ethics, privacy, and scale-copyright advice against your institution's requirements.

A.I.G

Vulnerability Patterns

Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs

SkillSpector

Vulnerability Patterns

Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
Trigger AbuseOverly Broad Trigger, Shadow Command Trigger, Keyword Baiting Trigger
Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code

Findings (5)

Vague Triggers

Medium

Category: Not specified by scanner
Confidence: 95% confidence
Finding: The skill advertises highly generic trigger phrases such as '帮我规划一下', '研究设计', and '我要做一个研究', which are broad enough to match many ordinary conversations beyond the intended psychology experiment planning scope. This can cause unintended invocation, leading the agent to switch contexts unexpectedly and provide irrelevant or premature guidance, especially in adjacent domains like education, surveys, or general planning.
Content: No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Ae4

Medium

Category: analysis-evasion
Confidence: 80% confidence
Finding: Suspicious Unicode normalization or mixed-script content
Content: No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium

Category: Not specified by scanner
Confidence: 97% confidence
Finding: The entire skill is written in Chinese and provides no indication that users may choose another language or locale. Under the stated policy, forcing a specific language without user opt-in is a natural-language policy violation unless the locale constraint is clearly documented and justified, which is not present here.
Content: No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low

Category: Not specified by scanner
Confidence: 98% confidence
Finding: This markdown file contains only Chinese-language instructional content from title to end, with no indication that the skill is region-specific or that users may choose another language. Per the policy, forcing a specific language without user opt-in is a natural-language policy violation.
Content: No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low

Category: Not specified by scanner
Confidence: 92% confidence
Finding: The entire document is written in Chinese and does not indicate that users may choose another language or that the content is intended only for a Chinese-language or region-specific audience. Under the policy, forcing a specific language without opt-in can be a natural-language policy violation.
Content: No source excerpt is available for this finding.