Security audit
Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk
This is a Markdown-only reverse-thinking prompt skill with no code execution, network use, credential handling, or persistence.
Install this if you want a Chinese-language reverse-thinking workflow. Be aware that its generic trigger phrases may activate it for ordinary strategy or brainstorming requests, and its reference examples contain some naming/domain inconsistencies, but I found no hidden code execution, data access, or persistence behavior.
The trigger list contains broad, generic phrases such as 逆向思维, 反常识, and 逻辑极端 that can plausibly appear in normal user requests unrelated to this skill. That increases the chance of unintended invocation, which can steer model behavior toward the skill's specialized framing without explicit user intent and may disrupt safer or more appropriate routing.
This markdown file contains natural-language instructions and examples exclusively in Chinese, and there is no indication that users may choose another language or that the skill is intentionally limited to a Chinese-speaking or region-specific context. Under the language/locale policy criterion, forcing a single language without opt-in can be a policy violation.
The entire skill exemplar is written as a Chinese-only template and does not indicate that users may choose another language or locale. Under the policy rule, forcing a specific language without user opt-in can be a natural-language policy violation when no justification or alternative is provided.
The entire skill file, including its title, description, and operational taxonomy, is written exclusively in Chinese, and there is no indication that users may choose another language or that the skill is intended only for a Chinese-language context. Under the policy, a fixed language/locale without opt-in or clear justification is a natural-language policy violation.
The title and the entire requirements checklist are written exclusively in Chinese, and the document presents these requirements as mandatory without indicating that users may choose another language. This creates a natural-language locale policy concern because it effectively forces a specific language absent opt-in or a documented regional justification.
The natural-language instructions and description are entirely Chinese, which effectively imposes a language requirement on users without opt-in or an explicit statement that the skill is region- or language-specific. Under the language/locale policy, a forced language should either be optional or clearly justified.
This markdown file presents all headings, descriptions, and task labels exclusively in Chinese, with no note that the skill is Chinese-only or that users may choose another language. Under the policy rule, forcing a specific language without opt-in is a natural-language locale issue.
This markdown skill exemplar is written entirely in Chinese and all input/output examples, section headings, and report formats assume Chinese-language interaction. Under the stated policy, a language constraint should either offer user choice or clearly document and justify the locale restriction; neither appears in the file.
The entire skill template, including headings, instructions, and examples, is written only in Chinese, with no indication that users may choose another language or that the skill is intended solely for a Chinese-language context. Under the policy, a language constraint can be a violation when it is imposed without user opt-in or explicit justification.
This markdown exemplar presents all headings, instructions, and examples exclusively in Chinese, and does not indicate that the user can choose another language or that the skill is intentionally limited to a Chinese-language context. Under the policy rule for natural-language violations, forcing a specific language without opt-in can be a locale-policy issue.
