Security audit

Dialectical Synthesis

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

This skill is a Chinese-language reasoning template for dialectical analysis and does not contain code execution, data access, persistence, or hidden privileged behavior.

Install this if you want a Chinese-language dialectical reasoning framework. Be aware that broad trigger terms may apply the framework to more tasks than intended, so users may need to explicitly opt out when they want a simpler answer.

A.I.G

Vulnerability Patterns

Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs

SkillSpector

Vulnerability Patterns

Trigger AbuseOverly Broad Trigger, Shadow Command Trigger, Keyword Baiting Trigger
Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code

Findings (8)

Vague Triggers

Medium

Category: Not specified by scanner
Confidence: 91% confidence
Finding: The trigger phrases are numerous and semantically broad, including generic concepts like '正反合', '矛盾统一', and '对立统一', without clear boundaries for when the skill should or should not activate. This can cause unintended invocation or routing collisions with unrelated tasks, especially in systems that auto-select skills based on keyword matching, leading to over-application of the skill's framing and possible interference with user intent.
Content: No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium

Category: Not specified by scanner
Confidence: 95% confidence
Finding: The skill content and description are entirely in Chinese, with no indication that users may interact in other languages or choose their preferred locale. Under the policy, a fixed language or locale is a violation unless the skill offers opt-in choice or clearly documents a justified regional constraint.
Content: No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium

Category: Not specified by scanner
Confidence: 94% confidence
Finding: The file's entire natural-language content, including the title, descriptions, and operational labels, is written exclusively in Chinese with no indication that users may choose another language or that the skill is region-specific. Under the policy rule for language or locale constraints, this reads as a forced language choice rather than an opt-in or clearly justified locale restriction.
Content: No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium

Category: Not specified by scanner
Confidence: 93% confidence
Finding: The title and the entire requirements document are written exclusively in Chinese, and there is no indication anywhere in the file that users may choose another language or that Chinese is required for a region-specific compliance reason. Under the policy, forcing a specific language without user opt-in is a natural-language locale violation.
Content: No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium

Category: Not specified by scanner
Confidence: 95% confidence
Finding: The entire skill exemplar is written as a Chinese-only template, with headings, inputs, processes, and outputs all fixed in Chinese and no indication that users may choose another language or locale. Under the language/locale policy rule, a skill that effectively mandates a specific language without opt-in is a natural-language policy concern.
Content: No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low

Category: Not specified by scanner
Confidence: 95% confidence
Finding: This markdown file presents all instructions, examples, and outputs only in Chinese, which can impose a language requirement on users without explicit opt-in. The policy allows locale constraints when they are clearly documented and justified, but no such justification or language-choice mechanism appears in the file.
Content: No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low

Category: Not specified by scanner
Confidence: 88% confidence
Finding: This markdown file presents all instructions, examples, and outputs exclusively in Chinese. Under the policy rule for natural-language violations, forcing a specific language without user opt-in can be a locale-policy issue when no choice or justification is provided.
Content: No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low

Category: Not specified by scanner
Confidence: 97% confidence
Finding: This markdown file contains natural-language instructions and examples exclusively in Chinese, and there is no indication that users may choose another language or that the skill is intentionally limited to a Chinese-speaking context. Under the policy rule for language or locale constraints, forcing a specific language without user opt-in is a policy concern.
Content: No source excerpt is available for this finding.