Security audit
Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk
This is a Chinese-language educational skill for breaking down and explaining concepts, with no code execution, credential access, persistence, or hidden data handling found.
Install this if you want a Chinese-language framework for decomposing complex topics into atomic concepts and explanation outlines. Be aware it may trigger on general knowledge-explanation prompts, and users who need multilingual behavior may need to ask explicitly for their preferred language.
The trigger list includes broad, commonly used phrases such as '知识讲解', '概念分拆', and '知识结构', which can cause the skill to activate in contexts far beyond its intended scope. Over-broad activation increases the chance of prompt-routing mistakes, unintended instruction precedence, and user confusion, especially in systems that automatically select skills based on keyword matches.
The skill metadata and body strongly imply Chinese-only behavior without documenting a language negotiation policy. In multi-language environments, this can lead to misaligned outputs, misunderstanding of user intent, or bypass of expected safety and usability behavior when the surrounding system assumes language adaptability.
The file is entirely authored in Chinese and line L03 defines the execution protocol in Chinese as the default interaction pattern, but it does not state that this is a region-specific or Chinese-only skill. Under the policy rule, forcing a specific language without user opt-in is a natural-language policy concern.
The title and the entire requirements document are written as a mandatory Chinese-language methodology specification, with no indication that users may choose another language or locale. Under the policy, forcing a specific language without user opt-in is a natural-language policy violation unless the locale restriction is clearly justified.
The document is entirely written in Chinese and presents its instructions and template labels only in that language. Under the stated policy, forcing a specific language without offering the user a choice or documenting a justified locale constraint is a natural-language policy violation.
This markdown exemplar presents all instructions, examples, and outputs exclusively in Chinese. Under the policy criteria, forcing a specific language without user opt-in can be a natural-language policy violation when no language choice or justification is provided.
This markdown file uses Chinese throughout and does not indicate that the user can choose another language or that the skill is intentionally limited to a Chinese-speaking context. Under the policy rule, forcing a specific language without opt-in is a natural-language policy concern.
This markdown skill exemplar presents all instructions and examples in Chinese, but does not state that the language is user-selectable or limited to a Chinese-language context. Under the policy rule, forcing a specific language without user opt-in can be a natural-language policy violation.
This markdown exemplar presents all headings, inputs, processes, and outputs exclusively in Chinese, with no note that the skill is Chinese-only or that users may select another language. Under the language/locale policy, forcing a specific language without user opt-in can be a natural-language policy violation.
