Back to skill

Security audit

AI Dev Workflow

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

This is a documentation-only AI coding workflow skill with some opinionated defaults, but no hidden execution, persistence, or data access behavior.

Install only if you want a Chinese-language, opinionated AI development workflow. Before using it for a real project, confirm the desired language, client/server stack, database, and security requirements so the generated code does not default to an unsuitable architecture.

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
  • Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
  • Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
  • Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
  • Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs
Vulnerability Patterns
  • Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
  • Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
  • Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
  • Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code
  • Excessive AgencyUnrestricted Tool Access, Autonomous Decision Making, Scope Creep
Findings (3)

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
95% confidence
Finding

The skill metadata and description are written only in Chinese, which implicitly constrains interaction to a specific locale without clearly offering a user-selected language option. This can cause the agent to respond in an unexpected language, reducing user control and increasing the chance that requirements, security constraints, or generated code details are misunderstood.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
95% confidence
Finding

The embedded architecture prompt hard-codes Kotlin as the unified programming language for client and server without user opt-in, which can override user intent and push generation toward an unsuitable stack. In a code-generation skill, this matters because hidden stack constraints can lead to insecure or incompatible outputs if the user's environment, policies, or review processes expect a different language.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
89% confidence
Finding

Line L38 explicitly requires the stack to '统一使用{Kotlin}语言'. In a natural-language policy sense, this forces a specific language choice rather than offering user selection or framing it as an optional example, and the document does not present an opt-in or alternative-language path.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Static analysis

No suspicious patterns detected.