Back to skill

Security audit

Agent Collaboration

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

This is a Markdown-only Chinese methodology skill for coordinating multiple agents, with no hidden code, network behavior, persistence, or credential handling found.

Install this if you want a Chinese-language workflow for planning and coordinating multi-agent work. Be aware that broad triggers such as team collaboration or parallel execution may cause it to influence tasks more often than expected, and it may encourage background or parallel agent use when available.

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
  • Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
  • Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
  • Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
  • Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs
Vulnerability Patterns
  • Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
  • Trigger AbuseOverly Broad Trigger, Shadow Command Trigger, Keyword Baiting Trigger
  • Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
  • Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
  • Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code
Findings (9)

Vague Triggers

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
92% confidence
Finding

The trigger phrases are broad enough to match ordinary discussion of collaboration, delegation, or parallel work, which can cause the skill to activate outside its intended scope. In an agent orchestration skill, over-triggering is risky because it can change execution behavior, encourage unnecessary delegation, and expand the chance of unintended tool or multi-agent use.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
78% confidence
Finding

The manifest description and all user-facing instructions are presented in Chinese, and there is no statement that users may choose another language or that the skill is intentionally region-specific. Under the policy, forcing a specific language without opt-in is a natural-language policy concern.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
92% confidence
Finding

This markdown file contains only Chinese-language instructions and labels, and there is no indication that users may choose another language or that the skill is intentionally limited to a Chinese-speaking context. That can violate language/locale policy when a skill forces a specific language without user opt-in.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
94% confidence
Finding

The title and core instruction require outputs in Chinese and state a fixed production method, but the document does not indicate that language selection is optional or user-configurable. Under the policy rule, forcing a specific language without user opt-in is a natural-language policy violation.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
93% confidence
Finding

This markdown file presents all instructions, labels, and examples exclusively in Chinese, which effectively forces a specific language on users. The policy allows locale-specific content only when the file offers user opt-in or clearly documents a justified regional constraint, neither of which appears here.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
92% confidence
Finding

This markdown file is natural-language instructional content, and all headings, steps, examples, and notes are presented exclusively in Chinese. Under the policy criteria, forcing a specific language without user opt-in or a documented justification is a language/locale policy violation.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
82% confidence
Finding

该范本整体以中文标题、步骤说明和示例呈现,未说明这是特定中文场景专用,也未向用户提供语言或地区选择。按照自然语言政策要求,若技能默认强制单一语言而无用户选择或明确地域性理由,可能构成语言/locale policy violation。

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
93% confidence
Finding

该 markdown 文件全文以中文编写,且标题、步骤、示例均默认要求中文使用环境,但没有提供用户语言选择、双语说明或明确的地域适用性声明。根据语言/locale 政策,若技能强制特定语言而未提供用户选择或正当说明,可构成自然语言策略违规。

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
95% confidence
Finding

This markdown file contains natural-language instructions and examples exclusively in Chinese, and nowhere indicates that the user can choose another language or that the template is intentionally limited to a Chinese-speaking context. Under the policy rule for language or locale constraints, forcing a specific language without opt-in is a natural-language policy concern.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.