Security audit

event-seating-orchestra

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

This seating-planning skill is purpose-aligned, but its annotated guest reports should be kept private.

Keep relationship notes and annotated reports private. Share only names and seat assignments with guests or vendors, and review the chart before printing; the reference already recommends keeping reasons in a separate master copy.

A.I.G

Vulnerability Patterns

Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs

SkillSpector

Vulnerability Patterns

Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
Output HandlingUnvalidated Output Injection, Cross-Context Output, Unbounded Output
Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code

Findings (2)

Printable rosters include seating rationales without a warning to keep sensitive guest information private.

Medium

Category: Output Handling
Confidence: 88% confidence
Finding: The skill combines printable seating rosters with explanatory notes derived from sensitive relationship, family-conflict, and accessibility information, without separating private planning details from distributable output. Sharing these annotated rosters with guests or venue staff could unnecessarily disclose personal information; this is a privacy-design omission rather than evidence of malicious intent.
Content: No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Ae4

Medium

Category: analysis-evasion
Confidence: 80% confidence
Finding: Suspicious Unicode normalization or mixed-script content
Content: No source excerpt is available for this finding.