Headphone Review
v1.0.5Use this skill when the user wants a buyer-facing long review of a headphone, IEM, earbud, or TWS model by name. Use AskUserQuestion in option mode first for...
⭐ 0· 74·0 current·0 all-time
MIT-0
Download zip
LicenseMIT-0 · Free to use, modify, and redistribute. No attribution required.
Security Scan
OpenClaw
Benign
high confidencePurpose & Capability
Name/description match the actual instructions: gather multilingual reviews, ask the user language/style options, synthesize a Markdown review. No unrelated binaries, env vars, or config paths are requested.
Instruction Scope
SKILL.md stays on-task: it requires asking two intake questions, collecting multiple review sources (including official/spec pages), and producing a structured Markdown review with a disagreement section. It does not instruct reading unrelated files, accessing credentials, or sending data to unknown endpoints. It does rely on the environment's web-access/browsing tools for research, which is appropriate for the stated purpose.
Install Mechanism
No install spec or code files to be downloaded or executed—this is an instruction-only skill, the lowest-risk category for installation.
Credentials
The skill requests no environment variables, credentials, or config paths. It references a $web-access browsing tool (expected for research) but does not declare or require any secrets.
Persistence & Privilege
always:false and default model invocation are set (normal). The skill does not request permanent presence, nor does it modify other skills or system-wide settings.
Assessment
This skill appears coherent and safe to install: it only contains runtime instructions for asking the user two options (language and description mode), researching public reviews via the agent's browsing tools, and producing a structured Markdown review. Things to consider before enabling: (1) the skill will perform web lookups — verify your agent's browsing tool and privacy settings if you care about what web requests are made; (2) the output is intentionally not supposed to include a Sources section (rules forbid adding source lists), so you may get synthesized conclusions without an explicit bibliography — expect limited traceability of individual claims; (3) the skill enforces stylistic and content constraints (hard bans on certain templates and punctuation) which may affect tone and phrasing; (4) since it gathers third-party reviews, verify factual points (specs, revisions) against official pages if accuracy is critical. No secrets or elevated privileges are required.Like a lobster shell, security has layers — review code before you run it.
latestvk973xf9t0b5gembv05s7b1ep8x84kr0w
License
MIT-0
Free to use, modify, and redistribute. No attribution required.