Incomplete referenced artifact analysis
- Category
- analysis-evasion
- Confidence
- 100% confidence
- Finding
Referenced artifact was not completely inspected
- Content
md Full sources for every rule: `references/sources.md`.
Security audit
Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk
ClawScan rates this skill suspicious with medium confidence, mainly because its documented install command uses an unpinned package and a recommended judging workflow may send scripts and briefs to external AI providers; one referenced file was only partially inspected.
Consider avoiding installation until you can verify and pin the installer and skill version. If using the judging workflow, check whether the selected AI provider is approved for your material, especially if it is confidential; the scan was partial, so some evidence remains incomplete.
Referenced artifact was not completely inspected
Full sources for every rule: `references/sources.md`.
Referenced artifact was not completely inspected
Story Spine, Harmon's circle and Save the Cat are in `references/sources.md` as audits, not molds.
Skill modifies its own code, configuration, or behavior at runtime. Self-modification enables an agent to escalate privileges, disable safety constraints, or install persistent backdoors.
## 1. Keep a test set
`references/test-briefs.md` holds six briefs, one per format. Before you edit this skill, write all six with the
current version and keep the files as the baseline. "Create evaluations BEFORE writing extensive documentation"
([Anthropic, skill best practices](https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/agents-and-tools/agent-skills/best-practices)).
The installation command executes an unpinned npm package through npx, exposing users to compromised future releases executing with their local permissions. This is a supply-chain weakness in the documented installation path, not an MCP server reference as the detector claims; there is no evidence the current package is malicious.
The workflow recommends judges from other model families and supplies prompts containing briefs and scripts, without checking whether those providers are approved to receive the material. For confidential launch plans or unreleased product claims, following this workflow with an external judge could disclose sensitive information; the risk depends on the chosen deployment and existing authorization.