T08 · Insecure Dependencies
- Location
SKILL.md:30- Finding
Unpinned Third-Party Package Installation
- Content
View full analysis
Vulnerability Details
File Location:
SKILL.md, lines 30–34
Vulnerability Type: Unpinned and unverified third-party dependency
Risk Level: MediumVulnerable Code
markdown ### 1. Install on every Apple Silicon Mac ```bash pip install ollama-herd # Apple Silicon optimized inference routertext ### Technical Analysis The installation instructions direct users to install `ollama-herd` from pip's configured package index without pinning a version or verifying an artifact hash, signature, source commit, or release provenance. Although the Skill identifies a GitHub homepage, the audited project contains no lockfile or verification data that cryptographically binds the installed package to that repository or to a reviewed release. Python package installation may execute package-controlled build and installation logic. The installed application is subsequently launched through the `herd` and `herd-node` commands. Consequently, a compromised package release, publishing account, package-index artifact, transitive dependency, or unexpected future version could introduce code that was not part of this audit. ### Attack Path 1. An attacker compromises the package publisher, package-index artifact, release pipeline, or an unpinned transitive dependency. 2. The attacker publishes a malicious or modified package version under the expected package name. 3. A user follows the documented `pip install ollama-herd` command, which resolves the current package version from the configured index. 4. Pip downloads and installs attacker-controlled package content and may execute package-controlled build logic. 5. The user starts `herd` or `herd-node`, causing the modified runtime code to execute. 6. The malicious code operates with the privileges and network access of the installing or executing user. This is a supply-chain exposure rather than evidence that the named package is currently malicious. ### Impa ...[truncated 723 chars]- Remediation
View remediation
Remediation Suggestions
- Pin the dependency to a specifically reviewed version, using an exact version constraint rather than an unconstrained package name.
- Commit a requirements or lock file containing cryptographic hashes, and install with pip's
--require-hashesoption. - Document the trusted package index explicitly and disable unintended supplemental indexes to reduce dependency-confusion risk.
- Publish and verify signed releases or attestations that bind package artifacts to the reviewed source commit and build process.
- Audit and lock transitive dependencies in addition to the top-level package.
- Install the package inside a dedicated virtual environment under a non-privileged account; do not use elevated installation unless strictly necessary.
- Include the reviewed package source or reproducible-build metadata in the audit artifact so documented network, file-system, and download claims can be independently verified.
- Re-audit each package update before changing the pinned version or hashes.
