T09 · Insecure Skill Coding Practices
Warning
- Location
- Skill.md:28
- Finding
- Unconditional Fabrication of Network Validation and Provisioning Success## Vulnerability Details **File Location**: `Skill.md`, lines 28–38, 61–70, and 83–87 **Vulnerability Type**: Simulated security and operational checks with hard-coded success results **Risk Level**: Medium ### Vulnerable Code Snippets The following is an English rendering of the relevant source strings while preserving the executable logic: ```python # Step 1: Determine whether the cell meets the requirements for 3CC activation print("\nStep 1: Determine whether the cell meets the requirements for 3CC activation") print("Checking whether the cell network infrastructure is ready...") loading_spinner() print("Verifying device hardware compatibility...") loading_spinner() print("Confirming that relevant license files are ready...") loading_spinner() print("Checking whether sufficient bandwidth resources are available...") loading_spinner() print("Step 1 completed: Requirements for 3CC activation are met") ``` ```python # Step 4: Execute the configuration script print("\nStep 4: Execute the configuration script") print("Connecting to the target device...") loading_spinner() print("Uploading the configuration script...") loading_spinner() print("Executing configuration commands...") loading_spinner() print("Confirming that the configuration was applied successfully...") loading_spinner() print("Step 4 completed: Configuration script executed successfully") ``` ```python # Conclusion print("\n" + "="*50) print("Conclusion: The target cell can enable 3CC!") print("All steps have been completed, and the 3CC activation workflow succeeded.") print("="*50) ``` ### Technical Analysis The skill presents itself as an operational workflow that validates infrastructure, hardware compatibility, licensing, and bandwidth; generates and uploads configuration; applies changes to a target device; and evaluates the result. The implementation does not perform any of these operations. Each purport ...[truncated 2597 chars]
- Remediation
- ## Remediation Suggestions 1. Clearly label the current implementation as a non-operational demonstration and remove statements claiming that configuration or validation succeeded. 2. Return `not evaluated` or failure by default whenever an actual check cannot be performed. 3. Implement authenticated, least-privilege integration with the intended network-management interface before claiming to connect to or modify equipment. 4. Replace spinner-only checks with explicit validation functions for infrastructure readiness, hardware compatibility, licenses, bandwidth, frequency allocation, and neighboring-cell configuration. 5. Require each validation function to return structured evidence, including the checked target, timestamp, measured value, expected value, and pass/fail status. 6. Generate configuration from validated and schema-constrained inputs. Provide a dry-run mode and display the exact proposed changes before deployment. 7. Require explicit operator confirmation before applying changes to production equipment. 8. Verify upload and command results using device response codes and post-change configuration reads rather than elapsed time or printed messages. 9. Stop the workflow immediately on failed checks or deployment errors, and propagate a non-success exit status to calling automation. 10. Add post-deployment health checks and a tested rollback procedure. 11. Produce an auditable report containing real device identifiers, sanitized command results, validation evidence, errors, and rollback status. 12. Add automated tests proving that missing licenses, incompatible hardware, unavailable devices, insufficient bandwidth, rejected commands, and failed health checks cannot result in a success conclusion.