Security audit

Note Taking（笔记管理）

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

This is a straightforward note-taking workflow skill; the main caveats are its Chinese-content convention and a GitHub submission step users should control.

Use this skill if you want notes organized under its Chinese-language convention. Before allowing the agent to commit or push anything to GitHub, review the generated notes and sidebar changes and confirm the target repository and branch.

A.I.G

Vulnerability Patterns

Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs

SkillSpector

Vulnerability Patterns

Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code
Excessive AgencyUnrestricted Tool Access, Autonomous Decision Making, Scope Creep

Findings (1)

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium

Confidence: 94% confidence
Finding: The language specification explicitly requires note content to be in Chinese, and the checklist repeats that content must use Chinese. This is a natural-language locale restriction with no user opt-in or justification that the skill is region-specific, which matches the policy-violation criteria.

Static analysis

No suspicious patterns detected.