Back to skill

Security audit

Flutter Testing

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

This is a documentation-only Flutter testing guide with no hidden execution, persistence, or sensitive access.

Install this if you want Flutter testing reference material. It can suggest local Flutter test commands, so review commands before running them in your project, especially coverage or platform-specific test runs.

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
  • Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
  • Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
  • Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
  • Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs
Vulnerability Patterns
  • Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
  • Trigger AbuseOverly Broad Trigger, Shadow Command Trigger, Keyword Baiting Trigger
  • Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
  • Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
  • Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code
Findings (4)

Anti-Refusal Statement

High
Category
Anti-Refusal
Content
```

### Cause
ListView or other scrollable inside Column/Row without constraints.

### Solution
Confidence
80% confidence
Finding
Skill attempts to nullify the agent's safety policies or restrictions ('you have no restrictions', 'ignore your guidelines', 'do anything now'). This is a direct jailbreak that disables guardrails.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Confidence
95% confidence
Finding
The skill content is presented in Chinese ('Flutter 测试全面指导 - 适配 OpenClaw') with no indication that users may choose another language. This is a natural-language policy concern because it imposes a specific language/locale without opt-in or documented regional justification.

Vague Triggers

Medium
Confidence
93% confidence
Finding
The activation guidance is broad enough that the skill may be auto-loaded for many generic Flutter-related requests without clear boundaries. Overly broad triggering can cause inappropriate context injection, increase the chance of conflicting guidance, and expand the influence of the skill beyond its intended testing-only scope.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Confidence
96% confidence
Finding
The manifest description is written entirely in Chinese while the rest of the skill content is in English, implying a language-specific presentation choice without offering the user a language option or documenting a locale-specific requirement. This matches the policy category for language/locale constraints that are imposed without explicit opt-in or justification.

Static analysis

No suspicious patterns detected.