Back to skill

Security audit

Arrive Guideline Architect

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

This skill is a local ARRIVE protocol/checklist generator whose file reads and writes are disclosed and aligned with its purpose.

Before installing, treat it as a local document-generation aid: review generated animal-study protocols with qualified ethics, veterinary, and statistical reviewers, and run it in a dedicated output directory if you want to avoid accidental overwrites.

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
  • Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
  • Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
  • Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
  • Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs
Vulnerability Patterns
  • Memory PoisoningPersistent Context Injection, Context Window Stuffing, Memory Manipulation
  • Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
  • Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
  • Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
  • Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code
Findings (7)

Memory Manipulation

High
Category
Memory Poisoning
Content
检查日期: 2026-02-06

## 1. Study Design
描述: For each experiment, provide brief details of study design including: the number of experimental and control groups; the number of animals per group; and a clear statement of whether the experiment was performed blinded.

检查要点:
  ☐ 明确实验组和对照组数量
Confidence
80% confidence
Finding
Skill manipulates agent memory, state, or stored context. Memory corruption can alter personality, override safety rules, or cause unpredictable behavior.

Memory Manipulation

High
Category
Memory Poisoning
Content
检查日期: 2026-02-06

## 1. Study Design
描述: For each experiment, provide brief details of study design including: the number of experimental and control groups; the number of animals per group; and a clear statement of whether the experiment was performed blinded.

检查要点:
  ☐ 明确实验组和对照组数量
Confidence
80% confidence
Finding
Skill manipulates agent memory, state, or stored context. Memory corruption can alter personality, override safety rules, or cause unpredictable behavior.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Confidence
86% confidence
Finding
This markdown file is written almost entirely in Chinese and does not indicate that language choice is optional or limited to a justified region-specific context. Under the policy rule for natural-language violations, forcing a specific language without user opt-in can be a locale policy issue.

Missing User Warnings

Low
Confidence
86% confidence
Finding
This markdown file documents file-writing behavior such as saving protocol outputs, allocation tables, and reports, but it does not explicitly warn users that running the tool will create or overwrite files on disk. For markdown files, SQP-2 applies when user-facing documentation omits warnings about behaviors that may affect user data or system integrity.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low
Confidence
87% confidence
Finding
This markdown file contains substantial bilingual content, with headings and checklist items primarily in Chinese while many descriptive sentences are in English. Under the policy rule for language/locale, the file presents a fixed language mix without any user opt-in or clear statement that the checklist is intentionally targeted to a Chinese-speaking audience.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low
Confidence
83% confidence
Finding
This JSON contains natural-language fields and values predominantly in Chinese, but there is no accompanying indication that the skill allows the user to choose the language or that the locale restriction is intentional and documented. Under the policy rule for language or locale constraints, forcing a specific language without opt-in can be a natural-language policy violation.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low
Confidence
88% confidence
Finding
This code's prompts and instructional text are hard-coded in English throughout the interactive workflow, and there is no indication that users may select another language or that English-only behavior is required for a region-specific purpose. Under the policy, forcing a specific language without user opt-in is a natural-language locale violation.

Static analysis

No suspicious patterns detected.